Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management

被引:3
|
作者
Veziant, Julie [1 ]
Boudis, Fabio [2 ]
Lenne, Xavier [2 ]
Bruandet, Amelie [2 ]
Eveno, Clarisse [1 ,3 ]
Nuytens, Frederiek [4 ]
Piessen, Guillaume [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hosp, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, Lille, France
[2] Lille Univ Hosp, Dept Med Informat, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Canc Heterogene Plast & Resistance Therapies, CNRS,Inserm,UMR9020,U1277,CANTHER, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] AZ Groeninge Hosp, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Kortrijk, Belgium
关键词
cohort study; esophageal perforation; morbidity; mortality; QUALITY; REPAIR; STENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4).Background:EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized.Methods:Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM.Results:Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of >= 8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM.Conclusions:We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 716
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evolution and Management of Esophageal Perforation: Improved Outcomes Are Associated with An Increasingly Non-Operative and Diversified Approach
    Felisky, Chance D.
    Kuppusamy, MadhanKumar
    Deeter, Matthew
    Kline, Elizabeth M.
    Koehler, Richard P.
    Low, Donald E.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A913 - A913
  • [12] INCIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF LASER-ASSOCIATED ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION
    TYRRELL, MR
    TROTTER, GA
    ADAM, A
    MASON, RC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (09) : 1257 - 1258
  • [13] Iatrogenic Neonatal Esophageal Perforation: A European Multicentre Review on Management and Outcomes
    Sorensen, Eva
    Yu, Connie
    Chuang, Shu-Ling
    Midrio, Paola
    Martinez, Leopoldo
    Nash, Mathew
    Jester, Ingo
    Saxena, Amulya K. K.
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [14] Surgical management of esophageal perforation: Role of esophageal conservation in delayed perforation
    Zumbro, GL
    Anstadt, MP
    Mawulawde, K
    Bhimji, S
    Paliotta, MA
    Pai, G
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2002, 68 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [15] MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION
    SKINNER, DB
    LITTLE, AG
    DEMEESTER, TR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 139 (06): : 760 - 764
  • [16] Management of Thoracic Esophageal Perforation
    Yidan Lin
    Guangliang Jiang
    Lunxu Liu
    Jack Xiwen Jiang
    Longqi Chen
    Yongfan Zhao
    Junjie Yang
    World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 1093 - 1099
  • [17] CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION
    THOMAS, GI
    GOFF, WF
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1965, 194 (10): : 1152 - &
  • [18] ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF AN ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION
    Elrod, Sarah
    Bedi, Angad
    Cox, Andrew
    Muhammadzai, Hamza
    Ringold, Daniel
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 2212A - 2212A
  • [19] CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION
    GROVES, LK
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1966, 196 (05): : 459 - &
  • [20] Acute Management of Esophageal Perforation
    Mavroudis, Constantine D.
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2014, 2 (01):