Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management

被引:3
|
作者
Veziant, Julie [1 ]
Boudis, Fabio [2 ]
Lenne, Xavier [2 ]
Bruandet, Amelie [2 ]
Eveno, Clarisse [1 ,3 ]
Nuytens, Frederiek [4 ]
Piessen, Guillaume [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hosp, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, Lille, France
[2] Lille Univ Hosp, Dept Med Informat, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Canc Heterogene Plast & Resistance Therapies, CNRS,Inserm,UMR9020,U1277,CANTHER, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] AZ Groeninge Hosp, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Kortrijk, Belgium
关键词
cohort study; esophageal perforation; morbidity; mortality; QUALITY; REPAIR; STENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4).Background:EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized.Methods:Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM.Results:Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of >= 8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM.Conclusions:We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 716
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors associated with management and negative outcomes of esophageal perforation
    Castrillon-Lozano, J. A.
    Arturo-Abadia, J. S.
    Acosta-Velasquez, J. J.
    REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2024, 89 (01): : 172 - 172
  • [2] Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation
    Axtell, Andrea L.
    Gaissert, Henning A.
    Morse, Christopher R.
    Premkumar, Akash
    Schumacher, Lana
    Muniappan, Ashok
    Ott, Harald
    Allan, James S.
    Lanuti, Michael
    Mathisen, Douglas J.
    Wright, Cameron D.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 35 (01)
  • [3] MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION IN THE ENDOSCOPIC ERA
    Kim, Jung Won
    Jung, Hye-Kyung
    Tae, Chung Hyun
    Jeon, Hyeon Kyeong
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Choe, A. R. Um
    Moon, Chang Mo
    Kim, Seong-Eun
    Shim, Ki-Nam
    Jung, Sung-Ae
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB570 - AB570
  • [4] Diagnosis, management and outcomes of thoracic esophageal perforation
    Panko, Siarhei
    Karpitski, Aliaksandr
    Shestjuk, Andrej
    Zhurbenko, Gennadij
    Boufalik, Rostislaw
    Vakulich, Denis
    Ignatjuk, Alaksandr
    MEDICAL STUDIES-STUDIA MEDYCZNE, 2014, 30 (04) : 234 - 240
  • [5] Management of esophageal perforation
    Nagel, M
    Konopke, R
    Wehrmann, U
    Saeger, HD
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1999, 124 (06): : 489 - 494
  • [6] Management of esophageal perforation
    Ökten, I
    Cangir, AK
    Özdemir, N
    Kavukçu, S
    Akay, H
    Yavuzer, S
    SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 31 (01): : 36 - 39
  • [7] Management of esophageal perforation
    Ökten I.
    Cangir A.K.
    ÖzdemIr N.
    Kavukçu S.
    Akay H.
    Yavuzer S.
    Surgery Today, 2001, 31 (1) : 36 - 39
  • [8] MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION
    YOUNGS, J
    NICOLOFF, D
    SURGERY, 1969, 65 (02) : 264 - &
  • [9] MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION
    不详
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 2 (6086): : 540 - 540
  • [10] MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION
    PAYNE, WS
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1975, 20 (04): : 486 - 487