Solving Nonlinear Elliptic PDEs in 2D and 3D Using Polyharmonic Splines and Low-Degree of Polynomials

被引:2
|
作者
Rubasinghe, Kalani [1 ]
Yao, Guangming [1 ,4 ]
Li, Wen [2 ,4 ]
Tsogtgerel, Gantumur [3 ]
机构
[1] Clarkson Univ Potsdam, Dept Math, New York, NY 13699 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Math, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Stat McGill Univ, Dept Math, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Fordham Univ New York City, Dept Math, New York, NY 10458 USA
关键词
Nonlinear elliptic equation; LMAPS; radial basis functions; polyharmonic splines; multiquadrics; APPROXIMATE PARTICULAR SOLUTIONS; LOCALIZED METHOD; MESHFREE METHOD; BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; EQUATIONS; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1142/S0219876222500517
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, the improved localized method of approximated particular solutions (ILMAPS) using polyharmonic splines (PHS) together with a low-degree of polynomial basis is used to approximate solutions of various nonlinear elliptic Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). The method is completely meshfree, and it uses a radial basis function (RBF) that has no shape parameters. The discretization process is done through a simple collocation technique on a set of points in the local domain of influence. Resulted system of nonlinear algebraic equations is solved by the Picard method.The performance of the proposed method is tested on various nonlinear elliptical problems, including the Poisson-type problems in 2D and 3D with constant or variable coefficients on rectangular or irregular domains and the Poisson-Boltzmann equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions or mixed boundary conditions. The effect of domain shapes in 2D and 3D, types of boundary conditions, and degrees of PHS, and order of polynomial basis are examined. The performance of the method is compared with other bases such as multiquadrics (MQ) basis functions, and with results reported in the literature (method of particular solutions using polynomials). The numerical experiments suggest that ILMAPS with polyharmonic splines yields considerably superior accuracy than other RBFs as well as other approaches reported in the literature for solving nonlinear elliptic PDEs.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using 2D Maps for 3D Localization
    De Floriani, Leila
    COMPUTER, 2016, 49 (03) : 5 - 5
  • [22] A Unified 3D Mapping Framework Using a 3D or 2D LiDAR
    Zhen, Weikun
    Scherer, Sebastian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EXPERIMENTAL ROBOTICS, 2020, 11 : 702 - 711
  • [23] Hybridized successive complementary expansions for solving convection-dominated 2D elliptic PDEs with boundary layers
    Cengizci, Sueleyman
    Natesan, Srinivasan
    COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 42 (06):
  • [24] Hybridized successive complementary expansions for solving convection-dominated 2D elliptic PDEs with boundary layers
    Süleyman Cengizci
    Srinivasan Natesan
    Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2023, 42
  • [25] Adaptive nonlinear filters for 2D and 3D image enhancement
    Guillon, S
    Baylou, P
    Najim, M
    Keskes, N
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1998, 67 (03) : 237 - 254
  • [26] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [27] Solving 3D Inverse Problems using Pre-trained 2D Diffusion Models
    Chung, Hyungjin
    Ryu, Dohoon
    Mccann, Michael T.
    Klasky, Marc L.
    Ye, Jong Chul
    2023 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2023, : 22542 - 22551
  • [28] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248
  • [29] EQP - A 2D/3D library for integration of polynomials times step function
    Mariggiò G.
    Fichera S.
    Corrado M.
    Ventura G.
    SoftwareX, 2020, 12
  • [30] Practical reliable Bayesian recognition of 2D and 3D objects using implicit polynomials and algebraic invariants
    Subrahmonia, J
    Cooper, DB
    Keren, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 18 (05) : 505 - 519