Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies in Takotsubo Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review

被引:2
|
作者
von Mackensen, Johanna K. R. [1 ,2 ]
Zwaans, Vanessa I. T. [1 ,2 ]
El Shazly, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Van Praet, Karel M. [3 ,4 ]
Heck, Roland [1 ,2 ]
Starck, Christoph T. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Schoenrath, Felix [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Potapov, Evgenij V. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Kempfert, Joerg [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Jacobs, Stephan [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Falk, Volkmar [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Wert, Leonhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Charite, Med Heart Ctr Charite, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] German Heart Inst, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] ASZ Hosp Aalst, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium
[4] Hartctr OLV Aalst, Cardiac Surg Dept, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium
[5] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site, D-10785 Berlin, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[7] Free Univ Berlin, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[8] Humboldt Univ, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[9] Berlin Inst Hlth, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[10] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Takotsubo; stress cardiomyopathy; cardiogenic shock; mechanical circulatory support; ECLS; IABP; Impella; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; TAKO-TSUBO CARDIOMYOPATHY; REFRACTORY HEART-FAILURE; STRESS CARDIOMYOPATHY; LIFE-SUPPORT; LIVER; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; IMPELLA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13020473
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Takotsubo syndrome is, by definition, a reversible form of acute heart failure. If cardiac output is severely reduced, Takotsubo syndrome can cause cardiogenic shock, and mechanical circulatory support can serve as a bridge to recovery. To date, there are no recommendations on when to use mechanical circulatory support and on which device is particularly effective in this context. Our aim was to determine the best treatment strategy. Methods: A systematic literature research and analysis of individual patient data was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. Our research considered original works published until 31 July 2023. Results: A total of 93 publications that met the inclusion criteria were identified, providing individual data from 124 patients. Of these, 62 (50%) were treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (va-ECLS), and 44 (35.5%) received a microaxial left ventricular assist device (Impella). Eighteen patients received an Impella CP and twenty-one an Impella 2.5. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) without other devices was used in only 13 patients (10.5%), while other devices (BiVAD or Tandem Heart) were used in 5 patients (4%). The median initial left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%, with no difference between the four device groups except for the IABP group, which was less affected by cardiac output failure (p = 0.015). The overall survival was 86.3%. Compared to the other groups, the time to cardiac recovery was shorter with Impella (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Though the Impella treatment is new, our analysis may show a significant benefit of Impella compared to other MCS strategies for cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo syndrome.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Mohit Pahuja
    Charan Yerasi
    Phillip H. Lam
    Hayder Hashim
    Itsik Ben-Dor
    Nelson L. Bernardo
    Lowell F. Satler
    Farooq H. Sheikh
    Samer S. Najjar
    Ezequiel J. Molina
    Ron Waksman
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2023, 25 : 213 - 227
  • [32] Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Pahuja, Mohit
    Yerasi, Charan
    Lam, Phillip H.
    Hashim, Hayder
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Bernardo, Nelson L.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Sheikh, Farooq H.
    Najjar, Samer S.
    Molina, Ezequiel J.
    Waksman, Ron
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 25 (04) : 213 - 227
  • [33] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in PosteMyocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chahdi, Hamza Ouazani
    Berbach, Lea
    Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
    Hillani, Ali
    Noiseux, Nicolas
    Matteau, Alexis
    Mansour, Samer
    Gobeil, Francois
    Nauche, Benedicte
    Jolicoeur, E. Marc
    Potter, Brian J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 38 (10) : 1525 - 1538
  • [34] Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Shock Team or Bust?
    Kim, Daniel H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (02) : 197 - 204
  • [35] MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT FOR CATASTROPHIC ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME-INDUCED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Wilson, Zachary T.
    Yenigalla, Sowjanya
    Ruiz, Gabriel S.
    Sista, Ramachandra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 4321 - 4321
  • [36] Cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome and the use of mechanical circulatory support - Is there a benefit?
    Figueiredo, M. Margarida
    Paula, S.
    Santos, M.
    Almeida, S.
    Almeida, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 310 - 310
  • [37] DISPARITIES IN THE IMPLANTATION OF MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Thangam, Manoj
    Luke, Alina
    Amin, Amit P.
    Lasala, John M.
    Maddox, Karen E. Joynt
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1325 - 1325
  • [38] Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock - Persistence and Progress
    Rao, Sunil V.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2024, 390 (15): : 1436 - 1438
  • [39] Transcaval access for mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Uribarri, Aitor
    Vidal, Maria
    Marti-Aguasca, Gerard
    REC-INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 6 (04):
  • [40] Reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Scholz, KH
    HERZ, 1999, 24 (06) : 448 - 464