Do Polygenic Risk Scores Add to Clinical Data in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer? A Scoping Review

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Louise [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Grimshaw, Alyssa A. [4 ]
Mezzacappa, Catherine [2 ]
Larki, Navid Rahimi [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yu-Xiao [3 ,5 ]
Justice, Amy C. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Digest Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Yale Univ, Harvey Cushing John Hay Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Med, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[8] 200 West Campus Dr, Orange, CT 06477 USA
关键词
GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI; VARIANTS; ONSET; MODEL;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0468
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) summarize an individual's germline genetic risk, but it is unclear whether PRS offer independent information for pancreatic cancer risk prediction beyond routine clinical data.Methods: We searched 8 databases from database inception to March 10, 2023 to identify studies evaluating the independent performance of pancreatic cancer-specific PRS for pancreatic cancer beyond clinical risk factors.Results: Twenty-one studies examined associations between a pancreatic cancer-specific PRS and pancreatic cancer. Seven studies evaluated risk factors beyond age and sex. Three studies evaluated the change in discrimination associated with the addition of PRS to routine risk factors and reported improvements (AUCs: 0.715 to 0.745; AUC 0.791 to 0.830; AUC from 0.694 to 0.711). Limitations to clinical applicability included using source populations younger/healthier than those at risk for pancreatic cancer (n = 10), exclusively of European ancestry (n = 13), or controls without relevant exposures (n = 1).Conclusions: While most studies of pancreatic cancer-specific PRS did not evaluate the independent discrimination of PRS for pancreatic cancer beyond routine risk factors, three that did showed improvements in discrimination.Impact: For pancreatic cancer PRS to be clinically useful, they must demonstrate substantial improvements in discrimination beyond established risk factors, apply to diverse ancestral populations representative of those at risk for pancreatic cancer, and use appropriate controls.
引用
收藏
页码:1490 / 1497
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Polygenic Risk Scores for cancer mortality prediction
    Sciurti, A.
    De Blasiis, M. R.
    Bolli, A.
    Busby, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [42] Polygenic and multifactorial scores for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk prediction
    Galeotti, Alice Alessandra
    Gentiluomo, Manuel
    Rizzato, Cosmeri
    Obazee, Ofure
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Pasquali, Claudio
    Nentwich, Michael
    Cavestro, Giulia Martina
    Pezzilli, Raffaele
    Greenhalf, William
    Holleczek, Bernd
    Schroeder, Cornelia
    Schottker, Ben
    Ivanauskas, Audrius
    Ginocchi, Laura
    Key, Timothy J.
    Hegyi, Peter
    Archibugi, Livia
    Darvasi, Erika
    Basso, Daniela
    Sperti, Cosimo
    Bijlsma, Maarten F.
    Palmieri, Orazio
    Hlavac, Viktor
    Talar-Wojnarowska, Renata
    Mohelnikova-Duchonova, Beatrice
    Hackert, Thilo
    Vashist, Yogesh
    Strouhal, Ondrej
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke
    Tavano, Francesca
    Lovecek, Martin
    Dervenis, Christos
    Izbeki, Ferenc
    Padoan, Andrea
    Malecka-Panas, Ewa
    Maiello, Evaristo
    Vanella, Giuseppe
    Capurso, Gabriele
    Izbicki, Jakob R.
    Theodoropoulos, George E.
    Jamroziak, Krzysztof
    Katzke, Verena
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    Mambrini, Andrea
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
    Szmola, Richard
    Szentesi, Andrea
    Kupcinskas, Juozas
    Bursi, Simona
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2021, 58 (06) : 369 - 377
  • [43] Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: A review of clinical utility and the ethical, legal and social implications of an emerging field
    Yanes, Tatiane
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 77 - 78
  • [44] How Well do Polygenic Risk Scores Identify Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Siltari, Aino
    Lonnerbro, Ragnar
    Pang, Karl
    Shiranov, Kirill
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Evans-Axelsson, Susan
    Franks, Billy
    Kiran, Amit
    Murtola, Teemu J.
    Schalken, Jack
    Steinbeisser, Carl
    Bjartell, Anders
    PIONEER Consortium
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2023, 21 (02) : 316e1 - 316e11
  • [45] Risk Stratification and Clinical Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Ophthalmology
    Qassim, Ayub
    Souzeau, Emmanuelle
    Hollitt, Georgie
    Hassall, Mark M.
    Siggs, Owen M.
    Craig, Jamie E.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (06):
  • [46] Development of a clinical assay for reporting polygenic risk scores
    Lebo, Matthew
    Hao, Limin
    Berriz, Gabriel
    Danowski, Morgan
    Koch, Christopher
    Kumar, Prathik Korategere
    Lewis, Anna
    Parpattedar, Shruti
    Steeves, Marcie
    Yu, Wanfeng
    Kraft, Peter
    Vassy, Jason
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2021, 132 : S217 - S217
  • [47] How do experts in psychiatric genetics view the clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia?
    Moorthy, Tiahna
    Nguyen, Huyan
    Chen, Ying
    Austin, Jehannine
    Smoller, Jordan W.
    Hercher, Laura
    Sabatello, Maya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2023, 192 (7-8) : 161 - 170
  • [48] Applicability of polygenic risk scores in endometriosis clinical presentation
    Agnes Svensson
    Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria
    Anna Åkesson
    Christer Borgfeldt
    Bodil Roth
    Malin Ek
    Mauro D’Amato
    Bodil Ohlsson
    BMC Women's Health, 22
  • [49] The clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for combined hyperlipidemia
    Dron, Jacqueline S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2023, 34 (02) : 44 - 51
  • [50] Assessing the Current Clinical Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores
    Ramos, Paola
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 69 (09) : 1094 - 1094