Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

被引:6
|
作者
Labib, Krishma [1 ]
Evans, Natalie [1 ]
Pizzolato, Daniel [2 ]
Bonn, Noemie Aubert [1 ]
Widdershoven, Guy [1 ]
Bouter, Lex [3 ,4 ]
Konach, Teodora [5 ]
Langendam, Miranda [6 ]
Dierickx, Kris [2 ]
Tijdink, Joeri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Ethics Law & Humanities, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Leuven, Ctr Biomed Ethics & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35,Box 7001, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Philosophy, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Biostat & Data Sci,Med Ctr, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Austrian Agcy Res Integr, Landstrasser Hauptstr 9,TOP 21, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Education; Training; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Guidelines; Institutions; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We used an iterative co-creative process. We conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops with 16 participants in total, which were informed by the RI education evidence-base. In the first two workshops, participants generated ideas for guidelines' content, focusing on different target groups and various approaches to RI education. Based on this content we developed first drafts of the guidelines. Participants in the third and fourth workshop refined those drafts. We next organized a working group which further prioritized, reorganized, and optimized the content of the guidelines. We developed four guidelines on RI education focusing on (a) bachelor, master and PhD students; (b) post-doctorate and senior researchers; (c) other RI stakeholders; as well as (d) continuous RI education. Across guidelines, we recommend mandatory RI training; follow-up refresher training; informal discussions about RI; appropriate rewards and incentives for active participation in RI education; and evaluation of RI educational events. Our work provides experience-based co-created guidance to research institutions on what to consider when developing a successful RI education strategy. Each guideline is offered as a distinct, publicly available tool in our toolbox () which institutions can access, adapt and implement to meet their institution-specific RI education needs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reflective practice as a research method for co-creating curriculum with international partner organisations
    Bilous, Rebecca H.
    Hammersley, Laura
    Lloyd, Kate
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION, 2018, 19 (03): : 287 - 296
  • [22] An Interdisciplinary Participatory Research for Co-creating a Relaxed Performance in a Theater Environment in Montreal
    Hammouni, Zakia
    Wittich, Walter
    Kehayia, Eva
    Verduyckt, Ingrid
    Martiniello, Natalina
    Hervieux, Emilie
    Poldma, Tiiu
    INTELLIGENT HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 2021, 2021, 1322 : 619 - 625
  • [23] Editorial: Addressing urban inequalities: co-creating pathways through research and practice
    Cocina, Camila
    Frediani, Alexandre Apsan
    Butcher, Stephanie
    Levy, Caren
    Acuto, Michele
    ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2022, 34 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [24] Guidelines for co-creating climate adaptation plans for fisheries and aquaculture
    Thuy Thi Thanh Pham
    Ragnhildur Friðriksdóttir
    Charlotte T. Weber
    Jónas R. Viðarsson
    Nikos Papandroulakis
    Alan R. Baudron
    Petter Olsen
    Juliana A. Hansen
    Unn Laksá
    Paul G. Fernandes
    Tarub Bahri
    Sigurður Ö. Ragnarsson
    Michaela Aschan
    Climatic Change, 2021, 164
  • [25] Guidelines for co-creating climate adaptation plans for fisheries and aquaculture
    Thuy Thi Thanh Pham
    Fridriksdottir, Ragnhildur
    Weber, Charlotte T.
    Vidarsson, Jonas R.
    Papandroulakis, Nikos
    Baudron, Alan R.
    Olsen, Petter
    Hansen, Juliana A.
    Laksa, Unn
    Fernandes, Paul G.
    Bahri, Tarub
    Ragnarsson, Sigurdur O.
    Aschan, Michaela
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 164 (3-4)
  • [26] Co-creating inclusion in research practices in the South Pacific: some highlights and challenges
    Ofe-Grant, Maulupeivao Betty
    Elikana, Miura
    SauLilo, Losi
    Vimahi, Lillian
    O'Brien, Seipua
    CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, 2025, 21 (01) : 89 - 104
  • [27] Co-Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' Project
    Fitzpatrick, Scott J.
    Lamb, Heather
    Oldman, Erin
    Giugni, Melanie
    Chakouch, Cassandra
    Morse, Alyssa R.
    Gulliver, Amelia
    Stewart, Erin
    Oni, Helen T.
    Miller, Benn
    Edwards, Bronwen
    Stewart, Kelly
    Bliokas, Vida
    Ellis, Louise A.
    Shand, Fiona
    Calear, Alison L.
    Banfield, Michelle
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (06)
  • [28] Whistle blowing and research integrity: Potential remedy for research misconduct in Malaysian institutions of higher education
    Olesen, Angelina Patrick
    Amin, Latifah
    Mahadi, Zurina
    Ibrahim, Maznah
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2019, 26 (01): : 17 - 32
  • [29] Research integrity guidelines in Japan
    Masanori Wada
    Nature, 2014, 514 : 35 - 35
  • [30] Research integrity guidelines in Japan
    Wada, Masanori
    NATURE, 2014, 514 (7520) : 35 - 35