Would the shipping alliance promote or discourage green shipping investment?

被引:8
|
作者
Shang, Tianyu [1 ]
Wu, Hao [2 ]
Wang, Kun [3 ]
Yang, Dong [1 ]
Jiang, Changmin [2 ]
Yang, Hangjun [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Logist & Maritime Studies, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green shipping; Shipping alliance; Emission tax; Shipping line; Port; INCENTIVE ANALYSIS; PORT; COMPETITION; EMISSION; INDUSTRY; COLLABORATION; CAPABILITIES; CARRIERS; IMPACTS; CHARGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2024.104102
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The international shipping industry has prioritized emissions reduction and invested in green shipping technologies. Shipping alliances have also significantly transformed market structure of container shipping industry, resulting in increased market power for major alliances in recent years. These strategic alliances have substantial implications for the economic incentives to invest in green shipping technologies. This study examines the impact of shipping alliances on green shipping investment by constructing an economic model comprising a port, two shipping lines, and government authority. The analysis demonstrates that shipping alliances promotes green shipping investments, even with increased shipping traffic, leading to an overall reduction in emissions. While these alliances improve shipper surplus, the enhancement of social welfare depends on whether cost savings from reduced emissions outweigh higher investment costs associated with green shipping. Endogenizing emission tax results in lower social -optimal emission tax, which drives more shipping traffic, offsetting emissions reduction from increased green shipping investment.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Green shipping and port operations
    Lee, Paul Tae-Woo
    Chang, Young-Tae
    Lai, Kee-hung
    Lun, Venus Y. H.
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 61 : 231 - 233
  • [22] Partner Selection of Strategic Alliance in Shipping Enterprises
    Ren, Xiao-Xue
    Wang, Xin-Ran
    Zhang, Ru
    Ding, Kai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ICMESD 17), 2017, 21 : 318 - 323
  • [23] Merger waves and alliance stability in container shipping
    Crotti, Daniele
    Ferrari, Claudio
    Tei, Alessio
    MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2020, 22 (03) : 446 - 472
  • [24] Multicriteria analysis in shipping investment evaluation
    Rousos, Evangelos-Pavlos
    Lee, Byung S.
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 39 (04) : 423 - 442
  • [25] Shipping decarbonization and green ports
    Psaraftis, Harilaos N.
    Zis, Thalis
    MARITIME TRANSPORT RESEARCH, 2022, 3
  • [26] Fuzzy real options and shared savings: Investment appraisal for green shipping technologies
    Metzger, Daniel
    Schinas, Orestis
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 77 : 1 - 10
  • [27] Merger waves and alliance stability in container shipping
    Daniele Crotti
    Claudio Ferrari
    Alessio Tei
    Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2020, 22 : 446 - 472
  • [28] POLICIES TO PROMOTE SHIPPING REGISTRATION IN SINGAPORE
    PHANG, SY
    TOH, RS
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1994, 28 (02) : 215 - 219
  • [29] How much would you pay for free shipping?
    Walker, Deborah
    NATURE, 2024,
  • [30] Improved vessel allocation model of liner shipping and its application for slot chartering under shipping alliance
    Chen, Ji-Hong
    Zhen, Hong
    Zong, Bei-Hua
    Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/ Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2008, 8 (03): : 120 - 125