Synergistic use of proximally sensed and time series remotely sensed imagery to map soil sodicity

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Zhao, Xueyu [1 ]
Triantafilis, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, POB 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
关键词
Proximal soil sensing; Landsat-8; Time series; Dimensionality reduction; PCA; Exchangeable sodium percentage; Digital soil mapping; Sentinel-2; ORGANIC-CARBON; PREDICTION; LANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2023.108466
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Soil sodicity can cause crusting in the topsoil which impedes water infiltration, and erosion in the subsoil owing to instability. These can impose constraints to sugarcane growth in the form of reduced plant emergence and root extension. To improve soil capability, a map of topsoil (0-0.15 m) exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) can be used to determine the amount of gypsum required to ameliorate soil condition. Herein, a digital soil mapping (DSM) approach was used to map top- and subsoil (0.3-0.45 m) ESP. To do this, we first examined prediction agreement of a calibration model between digital data and ESP, first comparing individual use of remotely sensed time series imagery (i.e., Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8) or proximal sensor (i.e., electromagnetic [EM] induction and gamma-ray [gamma-ray]) data. To account for the large amount of remote data we combined them using principal component analysis (PCA). We also investigated combining digital data using a backward feature elimination - BFE), along with minimum calibration sample size (n = 150-10) determined. Prediction agreement (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient - LCCC) and accuracy (ratio of performance to deviation - RPD) were assessed using an independent validation dataset (n = 32). To predict topsoil ESP, PCs from Landsat-8 provided excellent (LCCC = 0.90) agreement and very good (RPD = 2.26) accuracy, followed by Sentintel-2 (0.86, 1.75), gamma-ray (0.83, 1.84) and EM (0.78, 1.78), with subsoil ESP also excellent (0.90) and very good (2.51) using Landsat8, however; Sentintel-2 outperformed the others with even better results (0.95, 3.24), followed by EM (0.78, 1.76) and gamma-ray (0.73, 1.54). Moreover, slightly better results were achieved when EM, gamma-ray, and PCs of Sentinel2 were combined, with top- and subsoil ESP agreement (0.93 and 0.94, respectively) and accuracy (2.53 and 3.14, respectively) excellent. A minimum of 40 sampling sites were required (1.2 sites ha- 1) for the good prediction agreement and accuracy of top- (0.85, 2.13) and subsoil (0.84, 1.90) ESP. Based on the best results, DSM of ESP was made to recommend gypsum application rates to ameliorate sodic soils according to the Six-Easy-Steps Management Guidelines. The northern fields required variable rates (5, 7.5, and 10 t ha- 1) of gypsum, whereas the southern fields would not require gypsum.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Subpixel target size estimation for remotely sensed imagery
    Chang, CI
    Ren, HA
    D'Amico, F
    Jensen, JO
    ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY IX, 2003, 5093 : 398 - 407
  • [32] APPLICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL REMOTELY-SENSED IMAGERY IN AGRICULTURE
    Kokhan, S.
    100 YEARS ISPRS ADVANCING REMOTE SENSING SCIENCE, PT 2, 2010, 38 : 337 - 341
  • [33] MAIZE GROWTH AND CONDITION MONITORING WITH MULTISENSOR REMOTELY SENSED TIME SERIES
    Ghazaryan, Gohar
    Dubovyk, Olena
    Schreier, Jonas
    Graw, Valerie
    Schellberg, Juergen
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 2818 - 2821
  • [34] Detecting patterns of a technological intelligence in remotely sensed imagery
    Carlotto, Mark J.
    JBIS-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH INTERPLANETARY SOCIETY, 2007, 60 (01): : 28 - 39
  • [35] Agricultural applications from remotely sensed radar imagery
    Lefevre, RJ
    Jaroszewski, S
    Pieramico, A
    Corbeil, A
    Fox, B
    Jackson, CR
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS IV, 1999, 3750 : 179 - 185
  • [36] THE USE OF REMOTELY-SENSED SATELLITE IMAGERY FOR LANDSCAPE CLASSIFICATION IN WALES (UK)
    HAINESYOUNG, RH
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1992, 7 (04) : 253 - 274
  • [37] A new parallel tool for classification of remotely sensed imagery
    Bernabe, Sergio
    Plaza, Antonio
    Marpu, Prashanth Reddy
    Benediktsson, Jon Atli
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 46 : 208 - 218
  • [38] Haze Detection and Removal in Remotely Sensed Multispectral Imagery
    Makarau, Aliaksei
    Richter, Rudolf
    Mueller, Rupert
    Reinartz, Peter
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 52 (09): : 5895 - 5905
  • [39] Using Onboard Clustering to Summarize Remotely Sensed Imagery
    Hayden, David S.
    Chien, Steve
    Thompson, David R.
    Castano, Rebecca
    IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (03) : 86 - 91
  • [40] Automatic registration and mosaicking system for remotely sensed imagery
    Fedorov, D
    Fonseca, LMG
    Kenney, C
    Manjunath, BS
    IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING VIII, 2003, 4885 : 444 - 451