Synergistic use of proximally sensed and time series remotely sensed imagery to map soil sodicity

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Zhao, Xueyu [1 ]
Triantafilis, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, POB 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
关键词
Proximal soil sensing; Landsat-8; Time series; Dimensionality reduction; PCA; Exchangeable sodium percentage; Digital soil mapping; Sentinel-2; ORGANIC-CARBON; PREDICTION; LANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2023.108466
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Soil sodicity can cause crusting in the topsoil which impedes water infiltration, and erosion in the subsoil owing to instability. These can impose constraints to sugarcane growth in the form of reduced plant emergence and root extension. To improve soil capability, a map of topsoil (0-0.15 m) exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) can be used to determine the amount of gypsum required to ameliorate soil condition. Herein, a digital soil mapping (DSM) approach was used to map top- and subsoil (0.3-0.45 m) ESP. To do this, we first examined prediction agreement of a calibration model between digital data and ESP, first comparing individual use of remotely sensed time series imagery (i.e., Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8) or proximal sensor (i.e., electromagnetic [EM] induction and gamma-ray [gamma-ray]) data. To account for the large amount of remote data we combined them using principal component analysis (PCA). We also investigated combining digital data using a backward feature elimination - BFE), along with minimum calibration sample size (n = 150-10) determined. Prediction agreement (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient - LCCC) and accuracy (ratio of performance to deviation - RPD) were assessed using an independent validation dataset (n = 32). To predict topsoil ESP, PCs from Landsat-8 provided excellent (LCCC = 0.90) agreement and very good (RPD = 2.26) accuracy, followed by Sentintel-2 (0.86, 1.75), gamma-ray (0.83, 1.84) and EM (0.78, 1.78), with subsoil ESP also excellent (0.90) and very good (2.51) using Landsat8, however; Sentintel-2 outperformed the others with even better results (0.95, 3.24), followed by EM (0.78, 1.76) and gamma-ray (0.73, 1.54). Moreover, slightly better results were achieved when EM, gamma-ray, and PCs of Sentinel2 were combined, with top- and subsoil ESP agreement (0.93 and 0.94, respectively) and accuracy (2.53 and 3.14, respectively) excellent. A minimum of 40 sampling sites were required (1.2 sites ha- 1) for the good prediction agreement and accuracy of top- (0.85, 2.13) and subsoil (0.84, 1.90) ESP. Based on the best results, DSM of ESP was made to recommend gypsum application rates to ameliorate sodic soils according to the Six-Easy-Steps Management Guidelines. The northern fields required variable rates (5, 7.5, and 10 t ha- 1) of gypsum, whereas the southern fields would not require gypsum.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigation of nonlinearity in hyperspectral remotely sensed imagery - A nonlinear time series analysis approach
    Han, Tian
    Goodenough, David G.
    IGARSS: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-12: SENSING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR PLANET, 2007, : 1556 - 1560
  • [2] Digital processing of remotely sensed imagery
    Green, WB
    Jensen, D
    Culver, A
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 17A AND 17B, 1998, : 23 - 31
  • [3] MULTIRESOLUTION ANALYSIS OF REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY
    JONES, JG
    THOMAS, RW
    EARWICKER, PG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1991, 12 (01) : 107 - 124
  • [4] THE INTEGRATED USE OF DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHIC DATA AND REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY
    CATLOW, DR
    PARSELL, RJ
    WYATT, BK
    EARTH-ORIENTED APPLICATIONS OF SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 4 (04): : 255 - 260
  • [5] PIXEL SAMPLING OF REMOTELY SENSED DIGITAL IMAGERY
    FRANKLIN, SE
    PEDDLE, DR
    WILSON, BA
    BLODGETT, CF
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1991, 17 (06) : 759 - 775
  • [6] Registration techniques for multisensor remotely sensed imagery
    Fonseca, LMG
    Manjunath, BS
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 62 (09): : 1049 - 1056
  • [7] Unsupervised image classification for remotely sensed imagery
    Yang, SP
    Wang, J
    Chang, CI
    Jensen, JL
    Jensen, JO
    IMAGING SPECTROMETRY X, 2004, 5546 : 354 - 365
  • [8] Optimum Time Lag Determination for Yield Monitoring with Remotely Sensed Imagery
    Yang, C.
    Everitt, J.H.
    Bradford, J.M.
    Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2002, 45 (06): : 1737 - 1745
  • [9] Use of remotely sensed soil moisture to determine soil hydraulic properties
    Rawls, W
    Cosh, M
    Jackson, T
    Nemes, A
    IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 2791 - 2794
  • [10] An error budget for digital soil mapping of cation exchange capacity using proximally sensed electromagnetic induction and remotely sensed γ-ray spectrometer data
    Huang, J.
    Bishop, T. F. A.
    Triantafilis, J.
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 33 (03) : 397 - 412