Using the RE-AIM framework to assess national teledermatology expansion

被引:1
|
作者
Lamkin, Rebecca P. [1 ]
Peracca, Sara B. [2 ]
Jackson, George L. [3 ,4 ]
Hines, Aliya C. [5 ,6 ]
Gifford, Allen L. [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Lachica, Olevie [2 ]
Li, Donglin [1 ]
Morris, Isis J. [3 ]
Paiva, Marcelo [9 ]
Weinstock, Martin A. [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Oh, Dennis H. [2 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] United States Dept Vet Affairs, Vet Hlth Adm, Ctr Healthcare Org & Implementat Res CHOIR, VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[2] San Francisco VA Hlth Care Syst, Dermatol Serv, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] United States Dept Vet Affairs, Vet Hlth Adm, Ctr Innovat Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transf, Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Peter Odonnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
[5] United States Dept Vet Affairs, John D Dingell VA Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Dermatol, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Boston Univ, Dept Med, Chobanian & Avedisian Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
[9] United States Dept Vet Affairs, Ctr Dermatol, Providence VA Med Ctr, Providence, RI USA
[10] Brown Univ, Dept Dermatol & Epidemiol, Providence, RI USA
[11] Dept Vet Affairs, Off Connected Care, Washington, DC USA
[12] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
关键词
teledermatology; rural health; Veterans; implementation science; dermatology; expansion; asynchronous care; REAIM; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTIONS; PROGRAMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2023.1217829
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTeledermatology has been utilized in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for decades but continues to have incomplete penetration. VA has funded an initiative to enhance access to dermatology services since 2017 to support asynchronous teledermatology for Veterans living in rural areas. As part of an ongoing evaluation of this program, we assessed the teledermatology activity between the fiscal years 2020 and 2022. We focused on the second cohort of the initiative, comprising six VA facilities and their 54 referral clinics.MethodsWe studied teledermatology programs at cohort facilities using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. We used a mixed-methods design including annual online reports completed by participating facilities and VA administrative data. When possible, we compared the data from the 3 years of teledermatology funding with the baseline year prior to the start of funding.FindingsReach: Compared with the baseline year, there was a 100% increase in encounters and a 62% increase in patients seen at the funded facilities. Over 500 clinicians and support staff members were trained. Effectiveness: In FY 2022, primary or specialty care clinics affiliated with the funded facilities had more dermatology programs than primary or specialty care clinics across the VA (83% vs. 71% of sites). Adoption: By the end of the funding period, teledermatology constituted 16% of dermatology encounters at the funded facilities compared with 12% nationally. This reflected an increase from 9.2% at the funded facilities and 10.3% nationally prior to the funding period. Implementation: The continued funding for staff and equipment facilitated the expansion to rural areas. Maintenance: By the end of the funding period, all facilities indicated that they had fully implemented their program for patients of targeted primary care providers. The Program Sustainability Index scores generally increased during the funding period.ConclusionsTargeted funding to support asynchronous teledermatology implementation for rural Veterans increased its reach, adoption, and implementation, ultimately improving access. Providing program guidance with staffing and training resources can increase the impact of these programs. Ongoing efforts to maintain and increase communication between primary care and dermatology will be needed to sustain success.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of four dementia palliative care services using the RE-AIM framework
    Siobhan Fox
    Jonathan Drennan
    Suzanne Guerin
    W. George Kernohan
    Aileen Murphy
    Niamh O’Connor
    Aphie Rukundo
    Suzanne Timmons
    BMC Geriatrics, 23
  • [22] Qualitative Assessment of Implementation of a Discharge Prediction Tool Using RE-AIM Framework
    Finkelstein, Joseph
    Parvanova, Irena
    Xing, Zhaopeng
    Tuyet-Trinh Truong
    Dunn, Andrew
    CARING IS SHARING-EXPLOITING THE VALUE IN DATA FOR HEALTH AND INNOVATION-PROCEEDINGS OF MIE 2023, 2023, 302 : 596 - 600
  • [23] National Working Group on the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Goals, Resources, and Future Directions
    Harden, Samantha M.
    Strayer, Thomas Edward, III
    Smith, Matthew Lee
    Gaglio, Bridget
    Ory, Marcia G.
    Rabin, Borsika
    Estabrooks, Paul A.
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 7
  • [24] Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods
    Jodi Summers Holtrop
    Borsika A. Rabin
    Russell E. Glasgow
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [25] Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods
    Holtrop, Jodi Summers
    Rabin, Borsika A.
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [26] Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) re-aim framework
    Eloy Tamez-Perez, Hector
    Lisset Tamez-Gomez, Andrea
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2019, 15 (06): : E158 - E158
  • [27] The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time
    Gaglio, Bridget
    Shoup, Jo Ann
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (06) : E38 - E46
  • [28] Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate physical activity public health programs in Mexico
    Jauregui, Edtna
    Pacheco, Ann M.
    Soltero, Erica G.
    O'Connor, Teresia M.
    Castro, Cynthia M.
    Estabrooks, Paul A.
    McNeill, Lorna H.
    Lee, Rebecca E.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [29] Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation: an implementation study using the RE-AIM framework
    Bondarenko, Janet
    Babic, Chloe
    Burge, Angela T.
    Holland, Anne E.
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [30] Evaluating Blinatumomab Treatment Adoption in Varied Resource Settings Using the RE-AIM Framework
    Duffy, Caitlyn
    Fadoo, Zehra
    Ghara, Niharendu
    Santana, Victor
    Inaba, Hiroto
    Jeha, Sima
    Chen, Yichen
    Linh Pham
    Chung, Hyun Jy
    Devidas, Meenakshi
    Bhakta, Nickhill
    Brandt, Heather
    BLOOD, 2023, 142