Coevolution of Patch Selection in Stochastic Environments

被引:1
|
作者
Schreiber, Sebastian J. [1 ]
Hening, Alexandru [2 ]
Nguyen, Dang H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Evolut & Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Math, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Math, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
来源
AMERICAN NATURALIST | 2023年 / 202卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
coevolution; habitat selection; environmental stochasticity; portfolio theory; evolutionarily stable strategy; ENEMY-FREE-SPACE; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETIC-ANALYSIS; HABITAT SELECTION; EVOLUTIONARY STABILITY; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT; CONTRARY CHOICES; DISPERSAL; PREY;
D O I
10.1086/725079
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species interact in landscapes where environmental conditions vary in time and space. This variability impacts how species select habitat patches. Under equilibrium conditions, evolution of this patch selection can result in ideal free distributions where per capita growth rates are zero in occupied patches and negative in unoccupied patches. These ideal free distributions, however, do not explain why species occupy sink patches, why competitors have overlapping spatial ranges, or why predators avoid highly productive patches. To understand these patterns, we solve for coevolutionarily stable strategies (coESSs) of patch selection for multispecies stochastic Lotka-Volterra models accounting for spatial and temporal heterogeneity. In occupied patches at the coESS, we show that the differences between the local contributions to the mean and the variance of the long-term population growth rate are equalized. Applying this characterization to models of antagonistic interactions reveals that environmental stochasticity can partially exorcize the ghost of competition past, select for new forms of enemy-free and victimless space, and generate hydra effects over evolutionary timescales. Viewing our results through the economic lens of modern portfolio theory highlights why the coESS for patch selection is often a bet-hedging strategy coupling stochastic sink populations. Our results highlight how environmental stochasticity can reverse or amplify evolutionary outcomes as a result of species interactions or spatial heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 139
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coevolution of active vision and feature selection
    Floreano, D
    Kato, T
    Marocco, D
    Sauser, E
    BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2004, 90 (03) : 218 - 228
  • [22] Coevolution of active vision and feature selection
    Dario Floreano
    Toshifumi Kato
    Davide Marocco
    Eric Sauser
    Biological Cybernetics, 2004, 90 : 218 - 228
  • [23] Natural Selection, Coevolution, and the Web of Life
    Thompson, John N.
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2014, 183 (01): : IV - V
  • [24] Semiotic coevolution by organic and sociocultural selection
    Kohler, Alaric
    CULTURE & PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 20 (02) : 192 - 202
  • [25] Reciprocal selection at the phenotypic interface of coevolution
    Brodie, ED
    Ridenhour, BJ
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 43 (03) : 408 - 418
  • [26] RUNAWAY COEVOLUTION: ADAPTATION TO HERITABLE AND NONHERITABLE ENVIRONMENTS
    Drown, Devin M.
    Wade, Michael J.
    EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (10) : 3039 - 3046
  • [27] Coevolution of fairness and spite on stochastic dynamics networks
    Chen, Wei
    Wu, Te
    Li, Zhiwu
    Wang, Long
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2021, 405
  • [28] Swarm learning in restricted environments: an examination of semi-stochastic action selection
    Smith, Phillip
    Hunjet, Robert
    Khan, Asad
    2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION, ROBOTICS AND VISION (ICARCV), 2018, : 848 - 855
  • [29] The coevolution of robot behavior and central action selection
    Montes-Gonzalez, Fernando
    Nature Inspired Problem-Solving Methods in Knowledge Engineering, Pt 2, Proceedings, 2007, 4528 : 439 - 448
  • [30] Reciprocal selection at the phenotypic interface of coevolution.
    Brodie, ED
    Brodie, ED
    Ridenhour, BJ
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 42 (06) : 1202 - 1202