Perceptions of co-design, co-development and co-delivery (Co-3D) as part of the co-production process-Insights for climate services

被引:19
|
作者
Fleming, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
Bohensky, E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dutra, L. X. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, B. B. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Melbourne-Thomas, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
Moore, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Stone-Jovicich, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tozer, C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Clarke, J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Donegan, L. [11 ]
Hopkins, M. [7 ]
Merson, S. [6 ]
Remenyi, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Swirepik, A. [8 ]
Vertigan, C. [10 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Environm, Hobart 7005, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Environm, Brisbane 4000, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Environm, Aspendale 3195, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Environm, Townsville 4814, Australia
[5] Univ Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
[6] Pk Australia, Canberra 2601, Australia
[7] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[8] Dept Climate Change Energy Environm & Water, Canberra, Australia
[9] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart 7005, Australia
[10] Port Arthur Hist Site Management Author, Port Arthur 7182, Australia
[11] Fremantle Prison, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
关键词
Co; -design; -production; Collaboration; Australia; Case study; Participatory research; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; PRINCIPLES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100364
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-design, co-development, and co-delivery (Co-3D for short) are activities within the co-production research pathway that are increasingly being used in climate change science and adaptation projects. However, the research community is still coming to understand how best to incorporate Co-3D in practice, as each project has a specific context around stakeholder relationships, governance arrangements, and capacity to actively participate. This paper outlines five case studies from Australia as examples of different projects engaging with Co-3D in different ways in order to explore how Co-3D is being used and might be improved. Crucially, we include the perceptions and experiences of researchers, funders and end users, as well as our own critical reflections. Each of the projects self-describes as using 'co-production', but the extent and format varies widely with different combinations of co-design, co-development and/or co-delivery used in each. Our findings show that without clear understanding of Co-3D within the co-production process, aspects of Co-3D may not be properly considered in planning or implementation. Co-3D activities are not completely distinct, rather they form a continuum of engagement and integration across phases of project work. Thus, the specific definitions and delineations between these terms may not be required for them to be applied. However, practical and explicit negotiation of what 'co-production' means in different project contexts is needed so that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities. Further, more evaluations of outcomes and stakeholder experiences are required. We provide seven principles of Co-3D that should be considered when embarking on co-production projects.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Defining metrics for monitoring and evaluating the impact of co-production in climate services
    Visman, Emma
    Vincent, Katharine
    Steynor, Anna
    Karani, Irene
    Mwangi, Emmah
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2022, 26
  • [42] Operationalizing Co-Production in Public Services Delivery: The contribution of service blueprinting
    Radnor, Zoe
    Osborne, Stephen P.
    Kinder, Tony
    Mutton, Jean
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 16 (03) : 402 - 423
  • [43] Toward a multi-faceted conception of co-production of climate services
    Bremer, Scott
    Wardekker, Arjan
    Dessai, Suraje
    Sobolowski, Stefan
    Slaattelid, Rasmus
    van der Sluijs, Jeroen
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2019, 13 : 42 - 50
  • [44] Enhancing service development and service delivery through co-design
    Lam, Busayawan
    Dearden, Andy
    VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW, 2015, 6 (01): : 61 - 80
  • [45] Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future
    Masterson, Daniel
    Josefsson, Kristina Areskoug
    Robert, Glenn
    Nylander, Elisabeth
    Kjellstrom, Sofia
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (03) : 902 - 913
  • [46] Service as value co-production: reframing the service design process
    Morelli, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 20 (05) : 568 - 590
  • [47] From co-design to co-production: Approaches, enablers, and constraints in developing a public health, capacity-building solution
    Cosgrave, Catherine
    Kennedy, Alison
    Dietrich, Timo
    Gunn, Kate
    MacDonald, Joanna
    McKay, Claire
    Cunningham, Sally
    Haren, Sam
    Lewis, Josh
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2022, 30 (06) : 738 - 746
  • [48] Co-Production from the Viewpoint of Design and Computing Education Development
    Zarina, Solvita
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2020, 8 (04): : 484 - 495
  • [49] Communication-Wear User feedback as part of a co-design process
    Baurley, Sharon
    Brock, Philippa
    Geelhoed, Erik
    Moore, Andrew
    HAPTIC AND AUDIO INTERACTION DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4813 : 56 - +
  • [50] What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production?
    Vincent, Katharine
    Daly, Meaghan
    Scannell, Claire
    Leathes, Bill
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2018, 12 : 48 - 58