Evaluating annual severe coral bleaching risk for marine protected areas across Indonesia

被引:2
|
作者
De Clippele, Laurence H. [1 ]
Diaz, Laura Alonso [1 ]
Andradi-Brown, Dominic A. [2 ]
Lazuardi, Muhammad Erdi [3 ]
Iqbal, Mohamad [3 ]
Zainudin, Imam Musthofa [3 ]
Prabuning, Derta [4 ]
van Hooidonk, Ruben [5 ,6 ]
Hakim, Amehr [7 ]
Agung, Firdaus [7 ]
Dermawan, Agus [7 ]
Hennige, Sebastian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Changing Oceans Res Grp, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] World Wildlife Fund, Ocean Conservat, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[3] WWF Indonesia, Marine & Fisheries Directorate, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
[4] Reef Check Indonesia Fdn, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
[5] Univ Miami, Cooperat Inst Marine & Atmospher Studies, Miami, FL USA
[6] NOAA, Atlantic Oceanog & Meteorol Lab, Ocean Chem & Ecosyst Div, Miami, FL USA
[7] Minist Marine Affairs & Fisheries, Directorate Gen Marine Spatial Management, Jakarta, Indonesia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Coral reefs; Climate change; Bleaching; Marine protected areas; Indonesia; CLIMATE-CHANGE; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; REEFS; REFUGIA; CONSERVATION; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105428
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coral reefs face an uncertain future under global climate change, with thermal-induced bleaching increasing in frequency such that corals will soon experience annual severe bleaching (ASB). Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are therefore becoming increasingly important as a conservation tool. Here we evaluate (i) Indonesia's coral reefs' spatial variation in ASB, (ii) whether reefs projected to have a later onset of ASB (i.e. possible climate refugia) are protected within MPAs, and (iii) the ASB risk profiles for reefs related to MPAs receiving priority investments. Our results highlight considerable variability across Indonesia's reefs being at risk of ASB. The ASB risk before 2028 is greater for coral reefs protected by MPAs versus those outside MPA boundaries. The ASB risk before 2025 is greater for coral reefs protected by priority MPAs versus those protected by non-priority MPAs. Overall, our results show that only similar to 45% of the coral reef areas that are currently located within MPAs will likely act as thermal refugia (ASB > 2044). This is unsurprising given that the MPA network in Indonesia has been established over many decades, with most MPAs designated before suitable bleaching risk projections were available to inform MPA placement. Our results highlight the scope to further incorporate potential climate refugia for reefs into new MPA designations. This study also provides strategic information, which can support the development of Indonesia's long-term MPA and coral reef conservation strategy to effectively manage, mitigate, and adapt to the impacts of climate change on coral reefs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the influence of candidate terrestrial protected areas on coral reef condition in Fiji
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Jupiter, Stacy D.
    Watts, Matthew
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    MARINE POLICY, 2014, 44 : 360 - 365
  • [42] Identification of potential marine protected areas based on cumulative risk assessment: case study in Balikpapan Bay, Indonesia
    Meilana L.
    Fang Q.
    Roberts E.G.
    Susanto H.A.
    Ikhumhen H.O.
    Nelson B.R.
    Ocean and Coastal Management, 2024, 255
  • [43] Changes in the incidence of coral injuries during mass bleaching across Australia's Coral Sea Marine Park
    Burn, Deborah
    Matthews, Samuel
    Pisapia, Chiara
    Hoey, Andrew S.
    Pratchett, Morgan S.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2022, 682 : 97 - 109
  • [44] Evaluating the relative conservation value of fully and partially protected marine areas
    Sciberras, Marija
    Jenkins, Stuart R.
    Mant, Rebecca
    Kaiser, Michel J.
    Hawkins, Stephen J.
    Pullin, Andrew S.
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2015, 16 (01) : 58 - 77
  • [45] Poverty and protected areas: An evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia
    Gurney, Georgina G.
    Cinner, Joshua
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Pollnac, Richard
    Campbell, Stuart J.
    Tasidjawa, Sonny
    Setiawan, Fakhrizal
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 : 98 - 107
  • [46] Criteria, objectives and methodology for evaluating marine protected areas in South Africa
    Hockey, PAR
    Branch, GM
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE-SUID-AFRIKAANSE TYDSKRIF VIR SEEWETENSKAP, 1997, 18 : 369 - 383
  • [47] Evaluating stakeholder participatory processes in policy development for Marine Protected Areas
    Rasheed, A. Rifaee
    Abdulla, Ameer
    MARINE POLICY, 2020, 112
  • [48] Evaluating Linked Social-Ecological Systems in Marine Protected Areas
    Lopez-Angarita, Juliana
    Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio
    Higinio Maldonado, Jorge
    Sanchez, Juan A.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03): : 241 - 252
  • [49] Microplastic contamination in seawater across global marine protected areas boundaries
    Nunes, Beatriz Zachello
    Huang, Yuyue
    Ribeiro, Victor Vasques
    Wu, Siqi
    Holbech, Henrik
    Moreira, Lucas Buruaem
    Xu, Elvis Genbo
    Castro, Italo B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 316
  • [50] A global assessment of the direct and indirect benefits of marine protected areas for coral reef conservation
    Strain, Elisabeth M. A.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Ceccarelli, Daniela
    Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
    Hosack, Geoffrey R.
    Thomson, Russell J.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2019, 25 (01) : 9 - 20