Robots: How bad could it be globally?

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia, Carlos J. [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez, Wildo [1 ]
机构
[1] Alberto Hurtado Univ, Santiago, Chile
[2] Alberto Hurtado Univ, Almirante Barroso 10, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Robots; macroeconomic impact; labour market impact; cross-country comparison; development and economic growth; AUTOMATION;
D O I
10.1080/13504851.2024.2302911
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We show empirically that the global impact of robotization and similar technologies is heterogeneous at the aggregate level. Benefits are mostly concentrated in high-income countries. In contrast, robotization would have negative effects in middle- and high-income countries.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spherical motor could enhance robots
    不详
    IIE SOLUTIONS, 2001, 33 (03): : 18 - 18
  • [42] Insecure robots could be better at their jobs
    Reynolds, Matt
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2017, 234 (3129) : 11 - 11
  • [43] Globally asymptotically stable tracking control of mobile robots
    Kim, DH
    Oh, JH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 1297 - 1301
  • [44] Shanghai's High-end Hotel Overcapacity in 2011 and beyond: How Bad It Could Be and Why?
    Zheng, Tianshu
    Gu, Zheng
    TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2011, 16 (05): : 571 - 581
  • [45] How bad could it be? Worst-case bounds on bias in multistate models due to unobserved transitions
    Dudel, Christian
    Schneider, Daniel C.
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2023, 52 (04) : 1816 - 1837
  • [46] Learning How to Grow Globally
    Bingham, Christopher
    Davis, Jason
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 53 (03) : 16 - 18
  • [47] Globally stable dual-mode control of robots
    Gorez, R
    Antonelli, G
    MOTION CONTROL (MC'98), 1999, : 109 - 114
  • [48] How could I be wrong? How wrong could I be?
    Dennett, DC
    JOURNAL OF CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES, 2002, 9 (5-6) : 13 - 16
  • [49] Power quality. How bad is bad?
    McEachem, Alex
    EC and M: Electrical Construction and Maintenance, 1993, 92 (02):
  • [50] INTERPRETING THERMODYNAMIC CONSISTENCY - HOW BAD IS BAD
    SAMUELS, MR
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FUNDAMENTALS, 1972, 11 (03): : 422 - &