Urban sustainability implementation and indicators in the United States: A systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Pallathadka, Arun [1 ]
Chang, Heejun [1 ]
Ajibade, Idowu [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Geog, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Urban sustainability; Social-ecological-technological systems; Space; Scale; Dimension; Stakeholder; Urban governance; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SMART CITIES; EQUITY; CHALLENGES; COMMUNITY; COPRODUCTION; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100108
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban sustainability is the goal of many cities in the world, yet very few have achieved a level of sustainability that goes beyond the most basic environmental objectives. The practice and assessment of sustainability implementation are greatly compounded by lack of funding, technical know-how, political will, and the power disparity between dominant institutions and marginalized communities. This systematic analysis of urban sus-tainability literature involved the review of 241 studies published between 2010 and 2022. We critically examined current debates and challenges in urban sustainability, identifying gaps and opportunities and providing recommendations for creating equitable, just, and sustainable urban futures. We also reviewed 23 studies to summarize the social, ecological, and technological systems (SETS) indicators used to measure urban sustainability in the same period, many of which may not be relevant to the lived experiences of marginalized communities. To move toward more meaningful and equitable pathways, it is important to develop SETS in-dicators of urban sustainability that are reflective of the experiences and priorities of diverse groups in society. This review identifies four major issues in the current urban sustainability literature: space, scale, stakeholders, and dimension. These issues need to be centered in sustainability planning in order to develop solutions that are appropriate for the local context.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of complex instruction in the United States
    Villa III, Anthony Muro
    Sedlacek, Quentin C.
    INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION, 2025, 36 (01) : 10 - 25
  • [32] Pain and ethnicity in the United States: A systematic review
    Cintron, Alexie
    Morrison, R. Sean
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 9 (06) : 1454 - 1473
  • [33] Systematic Review of Rural and Urban Differences in Care Provided by Home Health Agencies in the United States
    Quigley, Denise D.
    Chastain, Ashley M.
    Kang, Jung A.
    Bronstein, David
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Stone, Patricia W.
    Shang, Jingjing
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (10) : 1653.e1 - 1653.e13
  • [34] Sustainability assessment indicators of road infrastructure projects: a systematic literature review
    Kapatsa, Chisomo
    Kavishe, Neema
    Zulu, Sambo Lyson
    Maro, Godwin
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [35] The city blueprint: experiences with the implementation of 24 indicators to assess the sustainability of the urban water cycle
    van Leeuwen, Cornelis J.
    Chandy, Philipo C.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2013, 13 (03): : 769 - 781
  • [36] Implementation and Integration of Sustainability in the Water Industry: A Systematic Literature Review
    Silva, Jorge Alejandro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [37] Sustainability and urban greenways - Indicators in Indianapolis
    Lindsey, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2003, 69 (02) : 165 - 180
  • [38] Urban sustainability indicators: Challenges and opportunities
    Verma, Pramit
    Raghubanshi, A. S.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 93 : 282 - 291
  • [39] Consensus Indicators of Sustainability for Urban Infrastructure
    Cedano, Karla
    Martinez, Manuel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2010,
  • [40] Barriers to the implementation of urban sustainability
    Banister, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 1998, 10 (01) : 65 - 83