KRAS mutation in primary ovarian serous borderline tumors correlates with tumor recurrence

被引:3
|
作者
McHenry, Austin [1 ]
Rottmann, Douglas A. [2 ]
Buza, Natalia [1 ]
Hui, Pei [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
KRAS mutation; Ovarian serous borderline tumor; Disease-free survival; ATYPICAL PROLIFERATIVE TUMORS; BRAF MUTATION; CARCINOMAS; NATIONWIDE; PATHOLOGY; IMPLANTS; RARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00428-023-03564-z
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Oncogenic activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway due to KRAS or BRAF gain-of-function mutation is frequently found in ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) and their extraovarian implants. We investigated mutational status of KRAS and BRAF of the primary ovarian SBTs that had a high stage presentation in correlation with clinical outcome. Among 39 consecutive primary SBTs with either invasive implants (20 cases) or non-invasive implants (19 cases), KRAS and BRAF mutational analysis was informative in 34 cases. Sixteen cases (47%) harbored a KRAS mutation, while 5 cases (15%) had a BRAF V600E mutation. High-stage disease (IIIC) was seen in 31% (5/16) of patients with a KRAS mutation and 39% (7/18) of patients without a KRAS mutation (p = 0.64). KRAS mutations were present in 9/16 (56%) tumors with invasive implants/LGSC versus 7/18 (39%) tumors with non-invasive implants (p = 0.31). BRAF mutation was seen in 5 cases with non-invasive implants. Tumor recurrence was seen in 31% (5/16) of patients with a KRAS mutation, compared to 6% (1/18) of patients without a KRAS mutation (p = 0.04). A KRAS mutation predicted an adverse disease-free survival (31% survival at 160 months) compared to those with wild-type KRAS (94% at 160 months; log-rank test, p = 0.037; HR 4.47). In conclusion, KRAS mutation in primary ovarian SBTs is significantly associated with a worse disease-free survival, independent of the high tumor stage or histological subtypes of extraovarian implant. KRAS mutation testing of primary ovarian SBT may servce as a useful biomarker for tumor recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OVARIAN SEROUS TUMORS OF LOW MALIGNANT POTENTIAL (SEROUS BORDERLINE TUMORS) - THE RELATIONSHIP OF EXOPHYTIC SURFACE TUMOR TO PERITONEAL IMPLANTS
    SEGAL, GH
    HART, WR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1992, 16 (06) : 577 - 583
  • [32] HDlive imaging of a serous borderline ovarian tumor
    Grigore, M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (05) : 598 - 599
  • [33] Recurrence of borderline papillary serous tumors: a modern dilemma
    Williams, Troy C.
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2006, 3 (01) : 49 - 51
  • [34] CD 56 expression in serous invasive ovarian cancer and serous ovarian borderline tumors
    Pokieser, W.
    Hauptmann, S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2010, 457 (02) : 151 - 151
  • [35] Second primary or recurrence?: Comparative patterns of p53 and K-ras mutations suggest that serous borderline ovarian tumors and subsequent serous carcinomas are unrelated tumors
    Ortiz, BH
    Ailawadi, M
    Colitti, C
    Muto, MG
    Deavers, M
    Silva, EG
    Berkowitz, RS
    Mok, SC
    Gershenson, DM
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 61 (19) : 7264 - 7267
  • [36] Ovarian serous borderline tumors with invasive peritoneal implants
    Gershenson, DM
    Silva, EG
    Levy, L
    Burke, TW
    Wolf, JK
    Tornos, C
    CANCER, 1998, 82 (06) : 1096 - 1103
  • [38] Serous borderline ovarian tumors: Where are we now?
    Karseladze, AI
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 26 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [39] Ovarian serous borderline tumors in women in reproductive age
    Musizzano, Y.
    Pacella, E.
    Marchiole, P.
    Toletone, A.
    Fulcheri, E.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2009, 455 : 307 - 307
  • [40] Genomic imbalances in ovarian borderline serous and mucinous tumors
    Hu, J
    Khanna, V
    Jones, MMW
    Surti, U
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2002, 139 (01) : 18 - 23