The Effects of the Staple Line Reinforcement Procedures on Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Its Early Results in Sleeve Gastrectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Yapalak, Yunus [1 ,2 ]
Yigman, Samet [1 ]
Gonultas, Ceren [1 ]
Coskun, Halil [1 ]
Yardimci, Erkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Adnan Menderes Bulvari,Vatan Caddesi, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
obesity; sleeve gastrectomy; staple line reinforcement; gastrointestinal symptoms; BARIATRIC SURGERY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; RELIABILITY; EFFICACY; VALIDITY; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2022.0210
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedure is the most common bariatric surgical technique worldwide, but controversy continues over staple line reinforcement (SLR) techniques. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare the effects of SLR methods on early postoperative complications and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients undergoing LSG for morbid obesity. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent LSG surgery for obesity between June 2019 and February 2020 in the Department of General Surgery of Bezmialem Vakif University were included in our prospective randomized study. According to the SLR techniques, three groups were determined as Group 1: using fibrin sealant (Tisseel (R)), Group 2: omentopexy, Group 3: no SLR, with each group having 30 randomly assigned patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed by performing the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) for all patients following the first week and first month. On the second postoperative day, all patients underwent swallow-graphy to investigate twists and fistula. Results: The test group included 90 patients totally, of which 17 are males and 73 are females with a mean age of 35.3 +/- 11.6 years and a mean body mass index of 45.3 +/- 7.7 kg/m(2). According to the GSRS, reflux and indigestion scores in Group 3 were significantly higher than those in the other groups in the first week (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in abdominal pain scores in the first week. Group 3's operation time was statistically significantly shorter than the other groups (Group 1 P = .005; Group 2 P = .001). In Group 3, 2 patients (2.2%) had bleeding. There was no mortality. There were no twists or fistulas found in swallow graphs. Symptomatic reflux was not observed in the first-year follow-up period. Conclusions: SLR methods reduce gastrointestinal system complaints in the early postoperative period. In our study, omentopexy and fibrin sealant used in LSG did not show a statistically significant difference in early postoperative complications.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 170
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of four different methods in staple line reinforcement during laparascopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Bulbuller, Nurullah
    Aslaner, Arif
    Oner, Osman Zekai
    Oruc, Mehmet Tahir
    Koc, Umit
    Ongen, Nuray Ayper
    Eryilmaz, Ramazan
    Cantilav, Guvenc
    Habibi, Mani
    Ozdemir, Sukru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 6 (10): : 985 - 990
  • [42] Management of the staple line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: comparison of three different reinforcement techniques
    José Manuel Fort
    Oscar Gonzalez
    Enric Caubet
    José Maria Balibrea
    Carlos Petrola
    Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela
    Marc Beisani
    Manel Armengol
    Ramon Vilallonga
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 3354 - 3360
  • [43] COST EFFICIENCY OF BIO-ABSORBABLE STAPLE LINE REINFORCEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY
    Layton, G.
    Naqvi, M.
    Lee, K.
    Khan, A.
    Mirza, S.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 : 55 - 55
  • [44] Prospective comparative study of the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Konstantinos M. Stamou
    Evangelos Menenakos
    Dimitris Dardamanis
    Calliope Arabatzi
    Leonidas Alevizos
    Konstantinos Albanopoulos
    Emmanuel Leandros
    George Zografos
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 3526 - 3530
  • [45] STUDYING STAPLE LINE REINFORCEMENT OF THE RESECTED STOMACH IN SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY - VL.076
    Salem, A. M.
    Abou Yassine, W.
    Hammod, I.
    Lotfy, Y.
    Mansour, A.
    Abou Zaid, F.
    Kaftaro, S.
    Asiri, A.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2014, 24 (08) : 1349 - 1349
  • [46] STAPLE LINE REINFORCEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY. EXPERIENCE IN 939 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS
    Sepulveda, M.
    Astorga, C.
    Hermosilla, J.
    Guzman, H.
    Rosso, N.
    Munoz, F.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 : S534 - S535
  • [47] A comparative study between staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and no reinforcement: an Egyptian experience
    El Masry, Mohamed Abdul Moneim Amin
    Attia, Mohamed Sabry
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (12): : 9318 - 9325
  • [48] DRAIN WITHDRAWAL IN MANAGEMENT OF STAPLE LINE LEAK IN SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY - EARLY CURE ?
    Sharma, M. S.
    Malhotra, S.
    Goswami, A. D.
    Sharma, S.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 : 140 - 140
  • [49] Standardised Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) without staple-line reinforcement - The answer to decreasing early complication rates?
    Lynn, William
    Ilczyszyn, Andrei
    Aguilo, Rachel
    Agrawal, Sanjay
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 8 - 9
  • [50] IS STAPLE LINE REINFORCEMENT NEEDED IN LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY (LSG)? 30 DAY COMPLICATIONS OF 1000 CONSECUTIVE UNREINFORCED LSGS Sleeve gastrectomy
    Lynn, W.
    Adebibe, M.
    Majid, S.
    Koak, Y.
    Devalia, K.
    Loy, J.
    Aguilo, R.
    Dixit, A.
    Goralczyk, A.
    Agrawal, S.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 1097 - 1097