Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems

被引:2
|
作者
Collins, Marissa [1 ]
Mazzei, Micaela [1 ]
Baker, Rachel [1 ]
Morton, Alec [2 ]
Frith, Lucy [3 ]
Syrett, Keith [4 ]
Leak, Paul [5 ]
Donaldson, Cam [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Yunus Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Social Eth & Policy, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Law Sch, Bristol, England
[5] Scottish Govt, Directorate Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Priority setting; Resource allocation; Integration; Economics; Decision science; Ethics; Law; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09866-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is an international move towards greater integration of health and social care to cope with the increasing demand on services.. In Scotland, legislation was passed in 2014 to integrate adult health and social care services resulting in the formation of 31 Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs). Greater integration does not eliminate resource scarcity and the requirement to make (resource) allocation decisions to meet the needs of local populations. There are different perspectives on how to facilitate and improve priority setting in health and social care organisations with limited resources, but structured processes at the local level are still not widely implemented. This paper reports on work with new HSCPs in Scotland to develop a combined multi-disciplinary priority setting and resource allocation framework.MethodsTo develop the combined framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to determine the key principles and approaches to priority setting from economics, decision-analysis, ethics and law, and attempts to combine such approaches. Co-production of the combined framework involved a multi-disciplinary workshop including local, and national-level stakeholders and academics to discuss and gather their views.ResultsThe key findings from the literature review and the stakeholder workshop were taken to produce a final combined framework for priority setting and resource allocation. This is underpinned by principles from economics (opportunity cost), decision science (good decisions), ethics (justice) and law (fair procedures). It outlines key stages in the priority setting process, including: framing the question, looking at current use of resources, defining options and criteria, evaluating options and criteria, and reviewing each stage. Each of these has further sub-stages and includes a focus on how the combined framework interacts with the consultation and involvement of patients, public and the wider staff.ConclusionsThe integration agenda for health and social care is an opportunity to develop and implement a combined framework for setting priorities and allocating resources fairly to meet the needs of the population. A key aim of both integration and the combined framework is to facilitate the shifting of resources from acute services to the community.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: Evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework
    Maluka, Stephen
    Kamuzora, Peter
    Sebastian, Miguel San
    Byskov, Jens
    Olsen, Oystein E.
    Shayo, Elizabeth
    Ndawi, Benedict
    Hurtig, Anna-Karin
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (04) : 751 - 759
  • [32] Applications of A Framework of Mental Health Promotions Interventions to Integrated Health and Social Care
    Davison, Karen
    Carroll, Simon
    MacPhee, Maura
    Hey, Brandon
    Robson, Lynda
    Thakkar, Vidhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [33] Combined hysterectomy and mastectomy surgery for transgender patients in an integrated health care setting
    Cizek, Stephanie
    Nguyen, Nancy
    Lyon, Liisa
    Zaritsky, Eve
    Weiss, Erica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSGENDERISM, 2017, 18 (04): : 382 - 388
  • [34] Developing a whole systems joint outcomes approach to contracting for integrated health and social care for older people
    Billings, Jenny
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2016, 16
  • [35] Priority setting for health research: lessons from developing countries
    Lansang, MA
    Neufeld, V
    Nuyens, Y
    Baris, E
    Diallo, B
    Figueroa, P
    Shrestha, M
    Paulino, R
    Raymundo, C
    Tan-Torres, T
    Freij, L
    Tollman, S
    Janjaroen, W
    Sitthi-Amorn, C
    Suwanwela, C
    Picou, D
    Okello, D
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2000, 15 (02) : 130 - 136
  • [36] Developing a priority setting partnership for preterm lung health research
    Hemy, N.
    Bates, A.
    Frank, B.
    McKenzie, A.
    Simspon, S.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2023, 28 : 79 - 79
  • [37] The prominence effect in health-care priority setting
    Persson, Emil
    Erlandsson, Arvid
    Slovic, Paul
    Vastfjall, Daniel
    Tinghog, Gustav
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 17 (06): : 1379 - 1391
  • [38] Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care
    Olsen, JA
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (06) : 625 - 639
  • [39] Rationing in Health Care: The Theory and Practice of Priority Setting
    Hunter, David J.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) : 176 - 178
  • [40] THE PROBLEM OF DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH-CARE PRIORITY SETTING
    HADORN, DC
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (11): : 1454 - 1459