Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems

被引:2
|
作者
Collins, Marissa [1 ]
Mazzei, Micaela [1 ]
Baker, Rachel [1 ]
Morton, Alec [2 ]
Frith, Lucy [3 ]
Syrett, Keith [4 ]
Leak, Paul [5 ]
Donaldson, Cam [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Yunus Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Social Eth & Policy, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Law Sch, Bristol, England
[5] Scottish Govt, Directorate Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Priority setting; Resource allocation; Integration; Economics; Decision science; Ethics; Law; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09866-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is an international move towards greater integration of health and social care to cope with the increasing demand on services.. In Scotland, legislation was passed in 2014 to integrate adult health and social care services resulting in the formation of 31 Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs). Greater integration does not eliminate resource scarcity and the requirement to make (resource) allocation decisions to meet the needs of local populations. There are different perspectives on how to facilitate and improve priority setting in health and social care organisations with limited resources, but structured processes at the local level are still not widely implemented. This paper reports on work with new HSCPs in Scotland to develop a combined multi-disciplinary priority setting and resource allocation framework.MethodsTo develop the combined framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to determine the key principles and approaches to priority setting from economics, decision-analysis, ethics and law, and attempts to combine such approaches. Co-production of the combined framework involved a multi-disciplinary workshop including local, and national-level stakeholders and academics to discuss and gather their views.ResultsThe key findings from the literature review and the stakeholder workshop were taken to produce a final combined framework for priority setting and resource allocation. This is underpinned by principles from economics (opportunity cost), decision science (good decisions), ethics (justice) and law (fair procedures). It outlines key stages in the priority setting process, including: framing the question, looking at current use of resources, defining options and criteria, evaluating options and criteria, and reviewing each stage. Each of these has further sub-stages and includes a focus on how the combined framework interacts with the consultation and involvement of patients, public and the wider staff.ConclusionsThe integration agenda for health and social care is an opportunity to develop and implement a combined framework for setting priorities and allocating resources fairly to meet the needs of the population. A key aim of both integration and the combined framework is to facilitate the shifting of resources from acute services to the community.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems
    Marissa Collins
    Micaela Mazzei
    Rachel Baker
    Alec Morton
    Lucy Frith
    Keith Syrett
    Paul Leak
    Cam Donaldson
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [2] DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITY SETTING IN AN INTEGRATED HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SETTING
    Collins, M.
    Baker, R.
    Mazzei, M.
    Morton, A.
    Frith, L.
    Syrett, K.
    Leak, P.
    Donaldson, C.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2018, 72 : A69 - A70
  • [3] Priority setting in primary health care: a framework for local catchments
    McDonald, J.
    Ollerenshaw, A.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2011, 11 (02):
  • [4] Priority setting in health care systems: too much or not enough
    Franz Porzsolt
    Journal of Public Health, 2010, 18 (2) : 95 - 96
  • [5] Priority setting in health care systems: too much or not enough
    Porzsolt, Franz
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2010, 18 (02): : 95 - 96
  • [6] Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital
    Lydia Kapiriri
    Douglas K Martin
    BMC Health Services Research, 6
  • [7] Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    Martin, Douglas K.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)
  • [8] Priority Setting: The Health Care Debate
    Bowling, Ann
    HEALTH & PLACE, 1998, 4 (01) : 99 - 99
  • [9] Priority setting in health care - Reply
    Torgerson, D
    Gosden, T
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7266): : 954 - 955
  • [10] Priority setting: The health care debate
    Elkeles, T
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (08) : 1097 - 1097