Tactics in Support of the Strategy to Include Artistic Research as Evidence in Systematic Reviews

被引:1
|
作者
Hannes, Karin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Social Sci, Res Grp SoMeTHinK, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Social Sci, Res Grp SoMeTHinK, Parkstr 45, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
systematic review; artistic research methods; arts-based research; Covid-19; qualitative evidence synthesis; FRAILTY; CALL;
D O I
10.1177/16094069231176391
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Artistic research studies produce a felt and often physically embodied type of knowledge initiated in an artistic experience and consolidated as an art form. The actual art work as the outcome of these studies, complements other types of knowledge and therefore requires attention from systematic review authors who synthesize evidence from primary studies. Working with artistic research evidence in a systematic review context requires a different approach to searching, appraising, analysing and integrating research findings than what is usually promoted by international review organisations. In this paper we outline how the different steps in a systematic review process can be adapted to include art work as as a multimodal type of research evidence in systematic reviews. We discuss useful tactics of identifying artistic research evidence, judging its value, analysing and synthesizing such evidence, hereby building on iconographic, thematic and/or art and design related analytical frameworks. In addition, we feature a gallery approach to present artistic research evidence to end-users and feature a multimodal type of evidence synthesis in which individual art works are comprehensively integrated in an audio visual production.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Literature Reviews as a Research Strategy
    Cowell, Julia Muennich
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL NURSING, 2012, 28 (05): : 326 - 327
  • [22] Research on subgroups is not research on equity attributes: Evidence from an overview of systematic reviews on vaccination
    Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
    Meike-Kathrin Zuske
    Christian Auer
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 16
  • [23] Research on subgroups is not research on equity attributes: Evidence from an overview of systematic reviews on vaccination
    Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier
    Zuske, Meike-Kathrin
    Auer, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2017, 16
  • [24] Software tools to support systematic reviews
    Marshall, Christopher
    Glanville, Julie
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, 10 : 34 - 35
  • [25] Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data
    Golder, Su
    Loke, Yoon K.
    Wright, Kath
    Sterrantino, Carmelo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 77 : 125 - 133
  • [26] When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews
    Jefferson, Tom
    Doshi, Peter
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Golder, Su
    Heneghan, Carl
    Hodkinson, Alex
    Jones, Mark
    Lefebvre, Carol
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2018, 23 (06) : 210 - 217
  • [27] Systematic reviews and research waste
    Nelson, Richard L.
    LANCET, 2016, 387 (10014): : 124 - 124
  • [28] Research Methods: Systematic Reviews
    Wilson, Virginia
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2013, 8 (03): : 83 - 84
  • [29] Research Methods: Systematic Reviews
    Wilson, Virginia
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2016, 11 (01): : 60 - 62
  • [30] Systematic reviews in health research
    Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
    Egger, Matthias
    Higgins, Julian
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (03) : 310 - 311