Lensing or luck? False alarm probabilities for gravitational lensing of gravitational waves

被引:22
|
作者
Caliskan, Mesut [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ezquiaga, Jose Marfa [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hannuksela, Otto A. [5 ]
Holz, Daniel E. [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, William H Miller Dept Phys & Astron 3, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Kavli Inst Cosmol Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Enr Fermi Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Niels Bohr Int Acad, Niels Bohr Inst, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Phys, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chicago, Dept Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[7] Univ Chicago, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ADVANCED LIGO; BLACK-HOLES; BINARY; REDSHIFT; SEARCH; IDENTIFICATION; DETECTIONS; SIGNATURES; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063023
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves (GWs) has been forecasted to become detectable in the upcoming LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA observing runs. However, definitively distinguishing pairs of lensed sources from random associations is a challenging problem. We investigate the degree to which unlensed events mimic lensed ones because of the overlap of parameters due to a combination of random coincidence and errors in parameter estimation. Lensed events are expected to have consistent masses and sky locations, and constrained relative phases, but may have differing apparent distances due to lensing magnification. We construct a mock catalog of lensed and unlensed events. We find that the probability of a false alarm based on coincidental overlaps of the chirp mass, sky location, and coalescence phase are approximately 9%, 1%, and 10% per pair, respectively. Combining all three parameters, we arrive at an overall false alarm probability per pair of similar to 10-4. We validate our results against the GWTC-2 data, finding that the catalog data is consistent with our simulations. As the number of events, N, in the GW catalogs increases, the number of random pairs of events increases as similar to N2. Meanwhile, the number of lensed events will increase linearly with N, implying that, for sufficiently high N, the false alarms will always dominate over the true lensing events. This issue can be compensated for by placing higher thresholds on the lensing candidates (e.g., selecting a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold, rho thr), which will lead to better parameter estimation and, thus, lower false alarm probabilities per pair-at the cost of dramatically decreasing the size of the lensing sample (proportional to rho-3thr). We show that with our simple overlap criteria for current detectors at design sensitivity, the false alarms will dominate for realistic lensing rates (less than or similar to 10-3) even when selecting the highest SNR pairs. These results highlight the necessity to design alternative identification criteria beyond simple waveform and sky location overlap for conclusive detection of strong lensing. Future GW detectors such as Cosmic Explorer and Einstein Telescope may provide sufficient improvement in parameter estimation and a commensurate decrease in the incidence of coincidental overlap of parameters, allowing for the conclusive detection of strong lensing of GWs even without additional detection criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gravitational Lensing
    Smith, Kendrick M.
    Cooray, Asantha
    Das, Sudeep
    Dore, Olivier
    Hanson, Duncan
    Hirata, Chris
    Kaplinghat, Manoj
    Keating, Brian
    LoVerde, Marilena
    Miller, Nathan
    Rocha, Graca
    Shimon, Meir
    Zahn, Oliver
    CMB POLARIZATION WORKSHOP: THEORY AND FOREGROUNDS: CMBPOL MISSION CONCEPT STUDY, 2009, 1141 : 121 - 178
  • [22] Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: wave nature and prospects for detection
    Meena, Ashish Kumar
    Bagla, Jasjeet Singh
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 492 (01) : 1127 - 1134
  • [23] Phase effects from strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves
    Ezquiaga, Jose Maria
    Holz, Daniel E.
    Hu, Wayne
    Lagos, Macarena
    Wald, Robert M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 103 (06)
  • [25] Limits on a stochastic background of gravitational waves from gravitational lensing
    BarKana, R
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1996, 54 (12): : 7138 - 7145
  • [26] Testing a new analytic model for gravitational lensing probabilities
    Das, Sudeep
    Ostriker, Jeremiah P.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 645 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [27] Propagation of electromagnetic waves in MOG: gravitational lensing
    Rahvar, S.
    Moffat, J. W.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 482 (04) : 4514 - 4518
  • [28] Strong Lensing of Gravitational Waves as Seen by LISA
    Sereno, M.
    Sesana, A.
    Bleuler, A.
    Jetzer, P. H.
    Volonteri, M.
    Begelman, M. C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 105 (25)
  • [29] Strong lensing of gravitational waves with modified propagation
    Takeda, Hiroki
    Tanaka, Takahiro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (10)
  • [30] Amplitude and phase fluctuations of gravitational waves magnified by strong gravitational lensing
    Oguri, Masamune
    Takahashi, Ryuichi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (04)