Impact of Social Reference Cues on Misinformation Sharing on Social Media: Series of Experimental Studies

被引:6
|
作者
Jones, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Diethei, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Schoening, Johannes [2 ,3 ]
Shrestha, Rehana [1 ,2 ]
Jahnel, Tina [1 ,2 ]
Schuez, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Inst Publ Hlth & Nursing Res, Bremen, Germany
[2] Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Publ Hlth, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ St Gallen, Sch Comp Sci, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bremen, Inst Publ Hlth & Nursing Res, Grazer Str 4, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
misinformation; social media; health literacy; COVID-19; fake news; Twitter; tweet; infodemiology; information behavior; information sharing; sharing behavior; behavior change; social cue; social reference; flag; LINEAR GROWTH; FAKE NEWS; POWER;
D O I
10.2196/45583
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health-related misinformation on social media is a key challenge to effective and timely public health responses. Existing mitigation measures include flagging misinformation or providing links to correct information, but they have not yet targeted social processes. Current approaches focus on increasing scrutiny, providing corrections to misinformation (debunking), or alerting users prospectively about future misinformation (prebunking and inoculation). Here, we provide a test of a complementary strategy that focuses on the social processes inherent in social media use, in particular, social reinforcement, social identity, and injunctive norms. Objective: This study aimed to examine whether providing balanced social reference cues (ie, cues that provide information on users sharing and, more importantly, not sharing specific content) in addition to flagging COVID-19-related misinformation leads to reductions in sharing behavior and improvement in overall sharing quality. Methods: A total of 3 field experiments were conducted on Twitter's native social media feed (via a newly developed browser extension). Participants'feed was augmented to include misleading and control information, resulting in 4 groups: no-information control, Twitter's own misinformation warning (misinformation flag), social cue only, and combined misinformation flag and social cue. We tracked the content shared or liked by participants. Participants were provided with social information by referencing either their personal network on Twitter or all Twitter users. Results: A total of 1424 Twitter users participated in 3 studies (n=824, n=322, and n=278). Across all 3 studies, we found that social cues that reference users' personal network combined with a misinformation flag reduced the sharing of misleading but not control information and improved overall sharing quality. We show that this improvement could be driven by a change in injunctive social norms (study 2) but not social identity (study 3). Conclusions: Social reference cues combined with misinformation flags can significantly and meaningfully reduce the amount of COVID-19-related misinformation shared and improve overall sharing quality. They are a feasible and scalable way to effectively curb the sharing of COVID-19-related misinformation on social media.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Misinformation Correction across Social Media Platforms
    Zhao, Wenqing
    2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (CSCI 2019), 2019, : 1371 - 1376
  • [42] Harnessing social media to challenge scientific misinformation
    Rein, Ben
    CELL, 2022, 185 (17) : 3060 - 3065
  • [43] Free but fake speech: When giving primacy to the source decreases misinformation sharing on social media
    Di Domenico, Giandomenico
    Nunan, Daniel
    Sit, Jason
    Pitardi, Valentina
    PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2021, 38 (10) : 1700 - 1711
  • [44] The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility
    Cecilie S. Traberg
    Trisha Harjani
    Jon Roozenbeek
    Sander van der Linden
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [45] Fighting Misinformation on Social Media: An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Prominence Reduction Policies
    Mudambi, Maya
    Clark, Jessica
    Rhue, Lauren
    Viswanathan, Siva
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [46] The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media
    Sadiq Muhammed T
    Saji K. Mathew
    International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2022, 13 : 271 - 285
  • [47] A Look at Social Media and Misinformation in Regard to Abortion
    Potter, Kaylee
    Bauer, Callie Cox
    Laiwalla, Rahim
    Lanza, Shannon
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 91S - 91S
  • [48] Combating Misinformation on Social Media Using Social Noise and Social Entropy as a Measure of Uncertainty
    Alsaid, Manar
    Parvathi Panguluri, Siva
    Hawamdeh, Suliman
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2024, 61 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [49] The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility
    Traberg, Cecilie S.
    Harjani, Trisha
    Roozenbeek, Jon
    van der Linden, Sander
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [50] Marketplaces of Misinformation: A Study of How Vaccine Misinformation Is Legitimized on Social Media
    Di Domenico, Giandomenico
    Nunan, Daniel
    Pitardi, Valentina
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 2022, 41 (04) : 319 - 335