RELATION BETWEEN THE TIME OF CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION IN PROGESTIN AND GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLS AND THE OUTCOMES OF IVF-A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

被引:0
|
作者
Ramos Seixas, N. [1 ]
Baldin, C. [2 ,3 ]
Feliciano Orlandini, M. [4 ]
Ingold, C. [1 ]
Parete Barbosa, C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fac Med ABC, Inst Ideia Fertil & Oya Care, Reprod Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Fac Med ABC, Santo Andre, Brazil
[3] Fac Med, Inst Ideia Fertil, Santo Andre, Brazil
[4] Fac Med, Ctr Univ Lusiada & Oya Care, Santos, SP, Brazil
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
P-635
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ovarian response in oocyte donation cycles under LH suppression with GnRH antagonist or desogestrel progestin: retrospective and comparative study
    Martinez, Francisca
    Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge
    Clua, Elisabet
    Garcia, Sandra
    Coroleu, Buenaventura
    Polyzos, Nikolaos
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (10) : 884 - 889
  • [42] COMPARISON BETWEEN 3 LONG PROTOCOLS OF OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR IVF USING A LONG-ACTING FORMULATION OF GNRH AGONIST
    VAUTHIERBROUZES, D
    LEFEBVRE, G
    CONTRACEPTION FERTILITE SEXUALITE, 1993, 21 (03): : 209 - 212
  • [43] A comparison between gonadotropin releasing hormone (GNRH) agonist and antagonist protocols in women with good ovarian reserve undergoing IVF.
    Stadtmauer, L. A.
    Duran, H.
    Bocca, S.
    Oehninger, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 : S437 - S437
  • [44] Comparison between start of ovarian stimulation on cycle day 2 versus cycle day 5 with GnRH antagonist in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial
    Sterrenburg, M.
    Blockeel, C.
    Eijkemans, M. J.
    Broer, S. L.
    Macklon, N. S.
    Broekmans, F. J.
    Devroey, P.
    Fauser, B. C. J. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I46 - I47
  • [45] A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Van Turnhout, C.
    Campo, R.
    Puttemans, P.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2012, 4 (02): : 82 - 87
  • [46] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY COMPARING A GNRH-ANTAGONIST VERSUS A GNRH-AGONIST SHORT PROTOCOL FOR OVARIAN STIMULATION IN PATIENTS REFERRED FOR IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Puttemans, P.
    Campo, R.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S176 - S176
  • [47] Oocyte competence is comparable between progestin primed ovarian stimulation with Norethisterone acetate (NETA-PPOS) and GnRH-antagonist protocols: A matched case-control study in PGT-A cycles
    Vaiarelli, Alberto
    Cimadomo, Danilo
    Ruffa, Alessandro
    Rania, Erika
    Pittana, Erika
    Gallo, Cinzia
    Fiorenza, Alessia
    Alviggi, Erminia
    Alfano, Simona
    Carmelo, Ramona
    Trabucco, Elisabetta
    Alviggi, Carlo
    Campitiello, Maria Rosaria
    Rienzi, Laura
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    Venturella, Roberta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 294 : 4 - 10
  • [48] Tailoring the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate to individual patients' needs in ovarian stimulation for IVF:: results of a prospective, randomized study
    Ludwig, M
    Katalinic, A
    Banz, C
    Schröder, AK
    Löning, M
    Weiss, JM
    Diedrich, K
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (11) : 2842 - 2845
  • [49] Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
    Huang, Jialyu
    Xie, Qin
    Lin, Jiaying
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Wang, Ningling
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Cai, Renfei
    Kuang, Yanping
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 2553 - 2563
  • [50] Influence of the duration of GnRH-antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol on IVF outcomes in patients with anovulation, endometriosis, premature ovarian failure (POF) and idiopathic infertility
    Gomez, J.
    Martinez-Sanchis, J. V.
    Iniesta Miron, I.
    Fernandez-Colom, P. J.
    Rubio Rubio, J. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 52 - 52