Reduced isometric knee extensor force following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the ipsilateral motor cortex

被引:3
|
作者
Savoury, Ryan G. [1 ]
Kibele, Armin [2 ]
Power, Kevin [1 ]
Herat, Nehara [1 ]
Alizadeh, Shahab [1 ]
Behm, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Univ Kassel, Inst Sport & Sport Sci, Kassel, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
POSTACTIVATION POTENTIATION; PERCEIVED EXERTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELBOW FLEXORS; TASK FAILURE; WARM-UP; TDCS; TIME; EXCITABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0280129
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe goal of this study was to determine if 10-min of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) to the motor cortex (M1) is capable of modulating quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force or fatigue endurance contralateral or ipsilateral to the stimulation site. MethodsIn a randomized, cross-over design, 16 (8 females) individuals underwent two sessions of a-tDCS and two sham tDCS (s-tDCS) sessions targeting the left M1 (all participants were right limb dominant), with testing of either the left (ipsilateral) or right (contralateral) quadriceps. Knee extensor (KE) MVC force was recorded prior to and following the a-tDCS and s-tDCS protocols. Additionally, a repetitive MVC fatiguing protocol (12 MVCs with work-rest ratio of 5:10-s) was completed following each tDCS protocol. ResultsThere was a significant interaction effect for stimulation condition x leg tested x time [F-(1,F-60) = 7.156, p = 0.010, eta p(2) = 0.11], which revealed a significant absolute KE MVC force reduction in the contralateral leg following s-tDCS (p < 0.001, d = 1.2) and in the ipsilateral leg following a-tDCS (p < 0.001, d = 1.09). A significant interaction effect for condition x leg tested [F-(1,F-56) = 8.12, p = 0.006, eta p(2) = 0.13], showed a significantly lower ipsilateral quadriceps (to tDCS) relative MVC force with a-tDCS, versus s-tDCS [t(15) = -3.07, p = 0.016, d = -0.77]. There was no significant difference between the relative contralateral quadriceps (to tDCS) MVC force for a-tDCS and s-tDCS. Although there was an overall significant [F-(1,F-56) = 8.36, p < 0.001] 12.1% force decrease between the first and twelfth MVC repetitions, there were no significant main or interaction effects for fatigue index force. Conclusiona-tDCS may be ineffective at increasing maximal force or endurance and instead may be detrimental to quadriceps force production.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
    Satoshi Tanaka
    Takashi Hanakawa
    Manabu Honda
    Katsumi Watanabe
    Experimental Brain Research, 2009, 196 : 459 - 465
  • [32] Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Hagenacker, Tim
    Bude, Vera
    Naegel, Steffen
    Holle, Dagny
    Katsarava, Zaza
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Obermann, Mark
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2014, 15
  • [33] Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex on Elbow Flexor Muscle Strength in the Very Old
    Oki, Kentaro
    Clark, Leatha A.
    Amano, Shinichi
    Clark, Brian C.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 42 (04) : 243 - 248
  • [34] Improving consolidation by applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at primary motor cortex during repetitive practice
    Kim, Taewon
    Kim, Hakjoo
    Wright, David L.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2021, 178
  • [35] Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Tim Hagenacker
    Vera Bude
    Steffen Naegel
    Dagny Holle
    Zaza Katsarava
    Hans-Christoph Diener
    Mark Obermann
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2014, 15
  • [36] Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Honda, Manabu
    Watanabe, Katsumi
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 196 (03) : 459 - 465
  • [37] Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation
    Vines, Bradley W.
    Nair, Dinesh G.
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    NEUROREPORT, 2006, 17 (06) : 671 - 674
  • [38] Multisession anodal transcranial direct current stimulation induces motor cortex plasticity enhancement and motor learning generalization in an aging population
    Dumel, Gaelle
    Bourassa, Marie-Eve
    Charlebois-Plante, Camille
    Desjardins, Martine
    Doyon, Julien
    Saint-Amour, Dave
    De Beaumont, Louis
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 129 (02) : 494 - 502
  • [39] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals
    Foerster, Aguida
    Dutta, Anirban
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 47 (07) : 779 - 789
  • [40] The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity
    Abedi, Razieh
    Talimkhani, Ailin
    Mohammadzadeh, Zahra
    Daryabor, Aliyeh
    Naimi, Sedigheh Sadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (10):