Tax incentives, environmental regulation and firms? emission reduction strategies: Evidence from China

被引:80
|
作者
Qi, Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Jianshun [2 ]
Chen, Jianwei [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Govt Audit, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Inst Educ & Econ Res, Acad China Open Econ Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
VAT reform; Emission reduction target; Interaction effect; Firm emission reduction strategies; China; FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS; INVESTMENT; POLLUTION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102750
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Policy interaction is an important way to deal with increasingly complex environmental prob-lems. This paper examines the investment-related tax cuts and the policy interaction with envi-ronmental regulation on firms' emission reduction strategies. Taking China's value-added tax (VAT) reform as a quasi-natural experiment and considering the interaction with the emission reduction target policy, our difference-in-differences estimation shows that: the average effect of the VAT reform reduces firms' sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission intensity by 16.6%, due to the adoption of emissions reduction strategies in the production processes; the interaction effect between the VAT reform and environmental regulation incentivizes firms to additionally reduce SO2 emission intensity, due to the adoption of both production processes and end-of-pipe reduction strategies. Our findings are more evident for firms with tight financial constraints. Overall, this paper reveals the micro-mechanisms of how the tax policies incentivize firms to choose emission reduction strategies and highlights the importance of the interaction effects between environmental and non-environmental policies, thus providing implications for the policy mix of environmental regulation and tax-cut incentives to promote pollution reduction and improve business performance.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tax Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from the Nigeria Listed Manufacturing Firms
    Oyerogba, Ezekiel Oluwagbemiga
    Alamu, Julius Adeyemi
    Olugbenro, Sunday Kola
    Sangodare, Tolulope Oyebanke
    JOURNAL OF TAX REFORM, 2024, 10 (02): : 355 - 380
  • [32] Tax incentives and firm social insurance contributions: Evidence from China
    Xiao, Renrui
    Xu, Pingguo
    Huang, Baocong
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 86
  • [33] The influence of environmental protection tax law on total factor productivity: Evidence from listed firms in China
    He, Yu
    Zhu, Xiaobo
    Zheng, Huan
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 113
  • [34] Can capital markets identify heterogeneous environmental investment strategies of firms? Evidence from China
    Hongwei Cheng
    Yi Feng
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 58253 - 58275
  • [35] Can capital markets identify heterogeneous environmental investment strategies of firms? Evidence from China
    Cheng, Hongwei
    Feng, Yi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (20) : 58253 - 58275
  • [36] The environmental benefit of tax enforcement: evidence from China
    Luo, Yu
    Zhang, Ming-ang
    Zhang, Sihan
    CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (01) : 78 - 96
  • [37] Local government fiscal squeeze, environmental regulation and firms' polluting behavior: Evidence from China
    Peng, Fei
    Wang, Ling
    Peng, Langchuan
    Wu, Huaqing
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 125
  • [38] Does environmental regulation inhibit enterprise performance? Evidence from listed energy firms in China
    Zhang, Xiekui
    Wang, Delei
    EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Environmental regulation and firm innovation: Evidence from National Specially Monitored Firms program in China
    Fang, Jiayu
    Gao, Chao
    Lai, Mingyong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
  • [40] Does environmental regulation affect stock price crash?-Evidence from polluting firms in China
    Xu, Gang
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 27 (01) : 1519 - 1543