Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Primary Simple Prostatectomy Versus Salvage Simple Prostatectomy in Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

被引:2
|
作者
Pathak, Ram A. A. [1 ]
Krol, Bridget C. C. [2 ]
Crain, Nikhil A. A. [2 ]
Hemal, Ashok K. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, Dept Urol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
robotic simple prostatectomy; benign prostatic hyperplasia; lower urinary tract symptoms; postoperative outcomes; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2022.0588
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Simple prostatectomy is indicated in patients with enlarged glands (>80 g) who present with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Salvage robotic simple prostatectomy (SSP) is defined as simple prostatectomy after failed transurethral procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of primary robotic simple prostatectomy (PSP) vs SSP in ameliorating LUTS.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 124 patients who underwent RSP between 2013 and 2021. Indications for surgery were enlarged prostate, bothersome LUTS, or symptoms refractory to medical management and/or previous prostate surgery. PSP and SSP preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables were recorded. The severity of LUTS was assessed using the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS). Two-tailed t-tests were performed to compare primary vs salvage RSP cohorts at a p-value of 0.05.Results: Of 124 patients who underwent RSP, 98 were primary and 26 were in the salvage setting with 16 patients undergoing prior transurethral resection of the prostate, 3 status post-transurethral microwave therapy, 1 status post-transurethral needle ablation of the prostate, and 3 status post-UroLIFT. Mean length of stay following RSP was 1.87 (days). At mean follow-up of similar to 12 months, no patient required reoperation for LUTS. Preoperative IPSS for primary and salvage RSP was 18.56 and 16.25, respectively (p = 0.36), and postoperative IPSS for primary and salvage RSP was 5.33 and 8.00, respectively (p = 0.38).Conclusion: Regardless of primary or salvage indication, RSP remains a highly efficient and durable procedure for improvement in LUTS. RSP performed in the salvage setting greatly improved urinary function outcomes in patients after failure of previous transurethral procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 421
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Pereira, Claudio
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Patel, Vipul
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (04) : 686 - 687
  • [42] Intermediate-term Urinary Function and Complication Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy
    Lee, Ziho
    Lee, Matthew
    Keehn, Aryeh Y.
    Asghar, Aeen M.
    Strauss, David M.
    Eun, Daniel D.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 141 : 89 - 94
  • [43] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy
    Zhang, Mimi W.
    El Tayeb, Marawan M.
    Borofsky, Michael S.
    Dauw, Casey A.
    Wagner, Kristofer R.
    Lowry, Patrick S.
    Bird, Erin T.
    Hudson, Tillman C.
    Lingeman, James E.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (09): : 847 - 850
  • [44] Urethra-Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Postoperative Antegrade Ejaculation
    Choi, Sae Woong
    Sohn, Dong Wan
    Ha, U-Syn
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (14)
  • [45] IS URETHRAL-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY READY FOR PRIME TIME?
    Francesco, Prata
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Amparore, Daniele
    Iannuzzi, Andrea
    Ragusa, Alberto
    Bove, Alfredo Maria
    Misuraca, Leonardo
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Enrico, Checcucci
    Brassetti, Aldo
    Cartolano, Silvia
    Zampa, Ashanti
    D'annunzio, Simone
    Mastroianni, Riccardo
    Spadaro, Giuseppe
    Tuderti, Gabriele
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Guaglianone, Salvatore
    Papalia, Rocco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Simone, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E808 - E809
  • [46] Stepwise Description and Outcomes of Bladder Neck Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Patel, Kinnari
    Na, Suzy
    Kim, Jessica
    El-Fahmawi, Ayah
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Lee, David I.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : 588 - 593
  • [47] MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY
    Harbin, Andrew
    Villanueva, Jeff
    Katz, Benjamin
    Agrawal, Vineet
    Rashid, Hani
    Joseph, Jean
    Hwang, Jonathan
    Lee, David
    Eun, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E20 - E21
  • [48] Simple Method to Predict Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Skarecky, Douglas
    Morales, Blanca
    Chang, Alexandra
    Ahlering, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (09) : 1451 - 1455
  • [49] Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results
    Castillo, Octavio
    Vidal-Mora, Ivar
    Rodriguez-Carlin, Arquimedes
    Silva, Andres
    Schatloff, Oscar
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 4 (02) : 61 - 64
  • [50] Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Extremely Large Prostates ≥200 cc: A Comparative Analysis
    van der Jeugt, Jolien
    Umari, Paolo
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Ribeiro, Luis
    Lambert, Edward
    Vollemaere, Jonathan
    Develtere, Dries
    Veys, Ralf
    Goossens, Marijn
    Pauwaert, Kim
    Scarcella, Simone
    Van Praet, Charles
    Pauwels, Elisabeth
    De Groote, Ruben
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Schatteman, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (08) : 895 - 902