Times Square Sampling: An Adaptive Algorithm for Free Energy Estimation

被引:1
|
作者
Predescu, Cristian [1 ]
Snarski, Michael [1 ]
Robinson-Mosher, Avi [1 ]
Sritharan, Duluxan [1 ]
Szalay, Tamas [1 ]
Shaw, David E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] DE Shaw Res, New York, NY 10036 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biophys, New York, NY USA
关键词
Adaptive Monte Carlo; Free energy calculations; Partition function ratios; Simulated tempering; Stochastic approximation; STOCHASTIC-APPROXIMATION; EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; NORMALIZING CONSTANTS; CONVERGENCE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1080/10618600.2023.2291108
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Estimating free energy differences, an important problem in computational drug discovery and in a wide range of other application areas, commonly involves a computationally intensive process of sampling a family of high-dimensional probability distributions and a procedure for computing estimates based on those samples. The variance of the free energy estimate of interest typically depends strongly on how the total computational resources available for sampling are divided among the distributions, but determining an efficient allocation is difficult without sampling the distributions. Here we introduce the Times Square sampling algorithm, a novel on-the-fly estimation method that dynamically allocates resources in such a way as to significantly accelerate the estimation of free energies and other observables, while providing rigorous convergence guarantees for the estimators. We also show that it is possible, surprisingly, for on-the-fly free energy estimation to achieve lower asymptotic variance than the maximum-likelihood estimator MBAR, raising the prospect that on-the-fly estimation could reduce variance in a variety of other statistical applications. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1083
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A successive umbrella sampling algorithm to sample and overcome free energy barriers
    Virnau, P
    Müller, M
    COMPUTER SIMULATION STUDIES IN CONDENSED-MATTER PHYSICS XVI, 2006, 103 : 151 - +
  • [22] Fast Motion Estimation Algorithm Combining Search Point Sampling Technique with Adaptive Search Range Algorithm
    Ko, Yun-Ho
    Kang, Hyun-Soo
    Suh, Jae-Won
    2012 IEEE 55TH INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (MWSCAS), 2012, : 988 - 991
  • [23] AN ADAPTIVE ESTIMATION ALGORITHM
    SASTRI, T
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1988, 20 (02) : 176 - 185
  • [24] Implementation of OSPOP, an algorithm for the estimation of optimal sampling times in pharmacokinetics by the ED, EID and API criteria
    Tod, M
    Rocchisani, JM
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1996, 50 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [25] Spectral estimation for diffusions with random sampling times
    Chorowski, Jakub
    Trabs, Mathias
    STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2016, 126 (10) : 2976 - 3008
  • [26] Adaptive block sub-sampling algorithm for motion-estimation on SIMD processors
    Jindal, M
    Rao, GN
    ICIP: 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1- 5, 2004, : 1457 - 1460
  • [27] Low-power metabolic equivalents estimation algorithm using adaptive acceleration sampling
    Tsukahara, Mio
    Nakanishi, Motofumi
    Izumi, Shintaro
    Nakai, Yozaburo
    Kawaguchi, Hiroshi
    Yoshimoto, Masahiko
    2016 38TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2016, : 1878 - 1881
  • [28] A METABOLIC EQUIVALENTS ESTIMATION ALGORITHM USING TRIAXIAL ACCELEROMETER AND ADAPTIVE SAMPLING FOR WEARABLE DEVICES
    Nakanishi, Motofumi
    Izumi, Shintaro
    Tsukahara, Mio
    Kawaguchi, Hiroshi
    Yoshimoto, Masahiko
    2017 IEEE LIFE SCIENCES CONFERENCE (LSC), 2017, : 107 - 110
  • [29] Variance estimation in adaptive cluster sampling
    Yasmeen, Uzma
    Thompson, Mary
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2020, 49 (10) : 2485 - 2497
  • [30] QUANTILE ESTIMATION WITH ADAPTIVE IMPORTANCE SAMPLING
    Egloff, Daniel
    Leippold, Markus
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2010, 38 (02): : 1244 - 1278