Study of seismic vulnerability of steel frame structures on soft ground considering group effect

被引:4
|
作者
Hou, Jiangjun [1 ]
Lu, Jinyu [1 ]
Chen, Shijin [1 ]
Li, Na [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
Steel frame structures; Seismic vulnerability; Structural group effect; Soil equivalent linearity; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.104934
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Earthquakes have caused increasingly severe casualties and economic losses in coastal urban areas where soft soils are widely distributed. To mitigate disaster losses, this paper aims to investigate the mechanism of the group effect, the interaction between a group of buildings (at least three) through the foundation, on seismic vulnerability in coastal urban areas. Firstly, the analysis models are established, and the validity is subsequently verified. Meanwhile, a self-built automatic iterative calculation program for multilayer soils is adopted to consider the nonlinearity of the soft soils. On this basis, probabilistic seismic demand analyses are further performed using ten earthquake ground motions. The seismic vulnerability formulas of the structures are obtained in combination with the probabilistic seismic demand models. Finally, the influence of the group effect on the seismic performance of the structures is evaluated from different perspectives based on the vulnerability formulas. The results indicate that the group effect of the steel frame structures makes the performance margin ratio (PMR) significantly higher and reduces the seismic vulnerability of the structures in coastal urban areas. The mechanism revealed in this paper presents a more accurate way to conduct earthquake-resistant design, provides guidelines for setting the criteria, and is likewise instructive to the seismic design of other structural forms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic analysis method for steel frame structures considering fracture of structural members based on shaking table tests
    Shiomi, Kensuke
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (05):
  • [32] Study on the seismic behavior of planar steel frame structures embedded with VV-SPSW
    Li D.
    Mu Z.-G.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36 : 210 - 216
  • [33] STUDY ON SEISMIC RETROFIT OF A FLEXIBLE STEEL FRAME
    Yang Runlin
    Zhao Yange
    Nie Ting
    Zhou Yangchun
    Zhou Hongyu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSPECTION APPRAISAL REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2010, : 1265 - +
  • [34] Numerical Model and Seismic Vulnerability of Infilled Industrial Steel Structures
    Liguori, Francesco Salvatore
    Madeo, Antonio
    Formisano, Antonio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2024 - VOL 1, 2024, 519 : 1078 - 1088
  • [35] Seismic retrofit of framed structures using a steel frame assembly
    Adane, Michael
    Chun, Seungho
    Kim, Jinkoo
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2023, 46 (06): : 857 - 865
  • [36] Updated empirical vulnerability model considering the seismic damage of typical structures
    Li, Si-Qi
    Formisano, Antonio
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (03) : 1147 - 1185
  • [37] Updated empirical vulnerability model considering the seismic damage of typical structures
    Si-Qi Li
    Antonio Formisano
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 22 : 1147 - 1185
  • [38] Seismic risk estimation of composite structures considering improved vulnerability levels
    Li, Si-Qi
    Chen, Yong-Sheng
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 65
  • [39] Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures
    Wang, Qiuwei
    Shi, Qingxuan
    Tang, Liujiu
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2011, 255-260 : 2421 - +
  • [40] SEISMIC PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES
    Sitraka, Tantely Jeriniaina
    He, Zheng
    SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2014, : 83 - 88