Predicting visual acuity with machine learning in treated ocular trauma patients

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Zhi-Lu [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yi-Fei [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jie-Min [2 ]
Liu, Rui-Jue [2 ]
Yu, Xiao-Ying [2 ]
Wang, Meng [2 ]
Hao, Hong-Xia [2 ,5 ]
Liu, Dong-Mei [2 ]
Zhang, Qi [3 ,4 ,8 ]
Wang, Jie [1 ,7 ]
Xia, Wen-Tao [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Med Univ, Dept Forens Med, Guiyang 550009, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Justice, Shanghai Forens Serv Platform, Inst Forens Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Forens Med, Shanghai 200063, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai Inst Adv Commun & Data Sci, SMART Smart Med & AI based Radiol Technol Lab, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[5] Jiamusi Univ, Basic Med Coll, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[6] 1347 Guangfu West Rd, Shanghai 200063, Peoples R China
[7] 9 Beijing Rd, Guiyang 50009, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
oculartrauma; predictingvisiual acuity; best-corrected visual acuity; visual dysfunction; machine learning; PARS-PLANA VITRECTOMY; INJURY; SCORE;
D O I
10.18240/ijo.2023.07.02
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
? AIM: To predict best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by machine learning in patients with ocular trauma who were treated for at least 6mo. ? METHODS: The internal dataset consisted of 850 patients with 1589 eyes and an average age of 44.29y. The initial visual acuity was 0.99 logMAR. The test dataset consisted of 60 patients with 100 eyes collected while the model was optimized. Four different machine-learning algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector regression, Bayesian ridge, and random forest regressor) were used to predict BCVA, and four algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest classifier) were used to classify BCVA in patients with ocular trauma after treatment for 6mo or longer. Clinical features were obtained from outpatient records, and ocular parameters were extracted from optical coherence tomography images and fundus photographs. These features were put into different machine-learning models, and the obtained predicted values were compared with the actual BCVA values. The best-performing model and the best variable selected were further evaluated in the test dataset. ? RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the predicted and actual values [all Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)>0.6]. Considering only the data from the traumatic group (group A) into account, the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.30 and 0.40 logMAR, respectively. In the traumatic and healthy groups (group B), the lowest MAE and RMSE were 0.20 and 0.33 logMAR, respectively. The sensitivity was always higher than the specificity in group A, in contrast to the results in group B. The classification accuracy and precision were above 0.80 in both groups. The MAE, RMSE, and PCC of the test dataset were 0.20, 0.29, and 0.96, respectively. The sensitivity, precision, specificity, and accuracy of the test dataset were 0.83, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.90, respectively. ? CONCLUSION: Predicting BCVA using machine-learning models in patients with treated ocular trauma is accurate and helpful in the identification of visual dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1014
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting visual acuity from the structure of visual cortex
    Srinivasan, Shyam
    Carlo, C. Nikoosh
    Stevens, Charles F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (25) : 7815 - 7820
  • [32] Objective measurement of visual acuity by optokinetic response determination in patients with ocular diseases
    Shin, YJ
    Park, KH
    Hwang, JM
    Wee, WR
    Lee, JH
    Lee, IB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (02) : 327 - 332
  • [33] COMPARISON OF 2 INTERFEROMETERS FOR PREDICTING VISUAL-ACUITY IN PATIENTS WITH CATARACT
    HALLIDAY, BL
    ROSS, JE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1983, 67 (05) : 273 - 277
  • [34] Multidimensional machine learning models predicting outcomes after trauma
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Henao, Ricardo
    Hensman, Hannah
    Stempora, Linda
    Chasse, Scott
    Schobel, Seth
    Dente, Christopher J.
    Kirk, Allan D.
    Elster, Eric
    SURGERY, 2022, 172 (06) : 1851 - 1859
  • [35] Predicting Serum Levels of Lithium-Treated Patients: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Tsai, Shang-Ying
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    Liang, Chih-Sung
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Solmi, Marco
    Vieta, Eduard
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    Hu, Chien-An
    Kao, Hung-Yu
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (11)
  • [36] Predicting hospital disposition for trauma patients: application of data-driven machine learning algorithms
    Alrashidi, Nasser
    Alrashidi, Musaed
    Mejahed, Sara
    Eltahawi, Ahmed A.
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2024, 9 (04): : 7751 - 7769
  • [37] Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Blunt Chest Trauma
    Chen, Yifei
    Lu, Xiaoning
    Zhang, Yuefei
    Bao, Yang
    Li, Yong
    Zhang, Bing
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 : 653 - 664
  • [38] Visual acuity evaluation in patients treated with ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema
    Stahel, Marc
    Ciechanowski, Peter
    Moser, Frank
    Lortz, Sandra
    Fassnacht, Heidi
    Graf, Nicole
    Becker, Matthias
    Michels, Stephan
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [39] IMPROVEMENT IN VISUAL ACUITY OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH BRAIN TUMORS TREATED WITH BEVACIZUMAB
    Dorris, Kathleen
    Hemenway, Molly
    Green, Adam
    Madden, Jennifer
    Mulcahy-Levy, Jean
    Vibhakar, Rajeev
    Foreman, Nicholas
    McCourt, Emily
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 157 - 157
  • [40] Functional visual acuity in patients with successfully treated amblyopia: a pilot study
    Sujin Hoshi
    Takahiro Hiraoka
    Junko Kotsuka
    Yumiko Sato
    Shinya Izumida
    Atsuko Kato
    Yuta Ueno
    Shinichi Fukuda
    Tetsuro Oshika
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2017, 255 : 1245 - 1250