Joint optimization of mission abort and system structure considering dynamic tasks

被引:30
|
作者
Zhao, Xian [1 ]
Liu, Haoran [1 ]
Wu, Yaguang [1 ]
Qiu, Qingan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mission abort; Dynamic tasks; Mission reliability; System survivability; Warm standby; POLICY; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109128
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Mission abort has recently attracted considerable attention to enhance the safety of critical systems during the primary mission (PM). Most of the existing research focuses on mission abort policies for systems performing a deterministic PM, i.e., operating for a fixed mission duration or completing a specified amount of work. However, in practice, systems are commonly required to perform dynamic tasks. This paper first makes advancements by jointly optimizing condition-based mission abort policies and system structure for the l-out-of-n: G warm standby system, where the dynamic arrival of tasks with a random amount of work is considered. In such systems, some components are initially in active mode, and the remaining warm standby components provide fault tolerance. Two types of mission success criteria are considered and corresponding mission abort policies are proposed based on different decision criteria. Mission reliability (MR) and system survivability (SS) are derived using recursive methods, considering the random switching of the active, idle, and warm standby modes under dynamic arrival of tasks. Mission abort policies and system structure are jointly optimized to balance MR and SS with the objective of minimizing the expected total cost. An example of a multiprocessor system is presented to illustrate the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] General models for system reliability and testability optimization considering multi mission profiles
    Shi, Junyou
    Li, Wenzhe
    Guo, Xuhao
    Yang, Yifan
    2017 PROGNOSTICS AND SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (PHM-HARBIN), 2017, : 377 - 384
  • [22] A dynamic mission abort policy for transportation systems with stochastic dependence by deep reinforcement learning
    Liu, Lujie
    Yang, Jun
    Yan, Bingxin
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 241
  • [23] Joint capacity configuration and demand response optimization of integrated energy system considering economic and dynamic control performance
    Wu, Xiao
    Yang, Lihua
    Zheng, Bingle
    ENERGY, 2024, 301
  • [24] Optimal mission abort policy for a multi-component system with failure interaction
    Cheng, Guoqing
    Shen, Jiayi
    Wang, Fang
    Li, Ling
    Yang, Nan
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 242
  • [25] Joint Optimization of Mode Switching, Loading Level, and Maintenance for Production Systems With Dynamic Tasks
    Zhao, Xian
    Liu, Haoran
    Han, He
    Qiu, Qingan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 20 (10) : 11565 - 11574
  • [26] Dynamic mission abort policy for systems operating in a controllable environment with self-healing mechanism
    Qiu, Qingan
    Cui, Lirong
    Wu, Bei
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 203
  • [27] Thermal Management System Optimization for a Parallel Hybrid Aircraft Considering Mission Fuel Burn
    Adler, Eytan J.
    Brelje, Benjamin J.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (05)
  • [28] Mission abort strategy for generalized k-out-of-n: F systems considering competing failure criteria
    Cao, Shuai
    Wang, Xiaoyue
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2024, 238 (04) : 839 - 852
  • [29] Topology optimization of structure for dynamic properties considering hybrid uncertain parameters
    Z. C. He
    Y. Wu
    Eric Li
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57 : 625 - 638
  • [30] Topology optimization of structure for dynamic properties considering hybrid uncertain parameters
    He, Z. C.
    Wu, Y.
    Li, Eric
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 57 (02) : 625 - 638