Emission and oxidative potential of PM2.5 generated by nine indoor sources

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Hao [1 ]
Ye, Jin [2 ]
Liu, Cong [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Yan, Lan [1 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Qian, Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power, Zhenjiang 212100, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Bldg Equipment Energy & Environm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Indoor sources; Oxidative potential; Emission rate; PM2; 5; PARTICULATE MATTER PM2.5; WATER-SOLUBLE COMPONENTS; MOSQUITO COIL EMISSIONS; AMBIENT PM2.5; PARTICLES; EXPOSURE; HEALTH; ULTRAFINE; FINE; AIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110021
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Indoor particulate matter (PM) sources pose great danger to air quality. This study used an environmental chamber to measure mass-normalized oxidative potential (OPM, a metric for intrinsic toxicity) and emission rates of nine indoor PM2.5 sources, including mainstream tobacco smoke, side-stream tobacco smoke, mosquito repellent coil, incense, moxa, scented candles, tobacco-heated e-cigarettes, liquid-heated e-cigarettes, and mosquito repellent electric mat. A dithiothreitol assay was used to measure the oxidative potential. A mass balancebased model was fitted to PM2.5 mass concentration records to calculate PM2.5 emission rates. Volumestandardized oxidative potential (OPV) exposure was calculated in a model room based on PM2.5 emission rate, and OPM obtained in this study. Overall, combustion sources were more detrimental than non-combustion sources. The highest and lowest mean OPM was found in the PM2.5 samples from side-stream tobacco smoke (99.5 pmol/min/mu g) and the liquid-heated e-cigarette (1.3 pmol/min/mu g), respectively. PM2.5 emission rates of indoor sources varied from 3153.9 mu g/min (mainstream tobacco smoke) to 4.0 mu g/min (scented candle). In the modeling room, PM2.5 from mosquito repellent coil showed the highest mean OPV (5.9 nmol/min/m3), although its mean mass concentration ranked second. OPV exposure caused by first-hand tobacco-heated e-cigarettes in one day was comparable to that caused by ambient PM2.5.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Composition and oxidative potential of PM2.5 pollution and health
    Robinson, Dorothy L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (03) : 444 - 447
  • [22] PM2.5 Emission Characteristics and Estimation of Emission Reduction Potential from Typical Industrial Sources in Anyang
    Du X.-S.
    Yan L.
    He J.-Y.
    Wang X.-Y.
    Wang K.
    Zhang R.-Q.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2019, 40 (05): : 2043 - 2051
  • [23] Applicability of ambient and indoor monitoring for personal exposure assessment to PM2.5 from different emission sources
    Kimmo, K
    Rufus, E
    Patrick, M
    Matti, J
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : S236 - S236
  • [24] Sources of indoor PM2.5 gross α and β activities measured in 340 homes
    Matthaios, Vasileios N.
    Liu, Man
    Li, Longxiang
    Kang, Choong-Min
    Vieira, Carolina L. Z.
    Gold, Diane R.
    Koutrakis, Petros
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 197
  • [25] Infiltration of ambient PM2.5 and levels of indoor generated non-ETS PM2.5 in residences of four European cities
    Hänninen, OO
    Lebret, E
    Ilacqua, V
    Katsouyanni, K
    Künzli, F
    Srám, RJ
    Jantunen, M
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (37) : 6411 - 6423
  • [26] Indoor residential and outdoor sources of PM2.5 and PM10 in Nicosia, Cyprus
    Yichen Wang
    Petros Koutrakis
    Antonis Michanikou
    Panayiotis Kouis
    Andrie G. Panayiotou
    Paraskevi Kinni
    Filippos Tymvios
    Andreas Chrysanthou
    Marina Neophytou
    Petros Mouzourides
    Chrysanthos Savvides
    Emily Vasiliadou
    Ilias Papasavvas
    Theodoros Christophides
    Rozalia Nicolaou
    Panayiotis Avraamides
    Choong-Min Kang
    Stefania I. Papatheodorou
    Nicos Middleton
    Panayiotis K. Yiallouros
    Souzana Achilleos
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2024, 17 : 485 - 499
  • [27] Characterization and sources of indoor and outdoor microplastics and PM2.5: Possible relationships
    Zheng, Han
    Yao, Kaixing
    Guo, Huibin
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2024, : 645 - 656
  • [28] Indoor residential and outdoor sources of PM2.5 and PM10 in Nicosia, Cyprus
    Wang, Yichen
    Koutrakis, Petros
    Michanikou, Antonis
    Kouis, Panayiotis
    Panayiotou, Andrie G.
    Kinni, Paraskevi
    Tymvios, Filippos
    Chrysanthou, Andreas
    Neophytou, Marina
    Mouzourides, Petros
    Savvides, Chrysanthos
    Vasiliadou, Emily
    Papasavvas, Ilias
    Christophides, Theodoros
    Nicolaou, Rozalia
    Avraamides, Panayiotis
    Kang, Choong-Min
    Papatheodorou, Stefania I.
    Middleton, Nicos
    Yiallouros, Panayiotis K.
    Achilleos, Souzana
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2024, 17 (03): : 485 - 499
  • [29] Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 emission sources at Chennai, India
    Jose, Jithin
    Srimuruganandam, B.
    Nagendra, S.M. Shiva
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2019, 18 (02) : 555 - 562
  • [30] Comparison of indoor and outdoor oxidative potential of PM2.5: pollution levels, temporal patterns, and key constituents
    Yang, Fan
    Liu, Cong
    Qian, Hua
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 155