Implementing industry 4.0 in the construction industry- strategic readiness perspective

被引:32
|
作者
Mansour, Husam [1 ]
Aminudin, Eeydzah [1 ]
Mansour, Tahseen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Sch Civil Engn, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
[2] Yarmouk Univ, Fac Mass Commun, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
Construction industry; readiness models; AHP; TOPSIS; Intellectual Capital; readiness assessment; INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL INDICATORS; MODELING BIM IMPLEMENTATION; MATURITY MODEL; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1080/15623599.2021.1975351
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Within the last five years, Industry 4.0 has become a disruptive wave of change that affects the construction industry in many ways. One of the most critical elements in this regard is the industry's implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies. In this study, we propose a multi-criteria decision-making model, named ConFIRM, to measure the strategic readiness of construction firms concerning Industry 4.0 implementation. The existing literature proposed some models to evaluate the maturity towards Industry 4.0. However, no model has yet been proposed that evaluates strategic readiness. Also, none focused on the construction industry. ConFIRM is a five-stage model where the modified AHP-TOPSIS technique was used to assess the readiness level. The model was evaluated and quantified using a panel of experts from the Malaysian construction industry. The results indicated that the human capital component is the most critical factor affecting the success of Industry 4.0 implementation. Specifically, the intellectual agility, knowledge, skills, and competencies of the construction professionals. Consequently, a case study was used to test the utilisation of the proposed model. Moreover, recommendations to enhance the readiness level were concluded from the readiness model.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1470
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Drivers and Barriers for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Practice: A SME Perspective with Empirical Evidence
    Stentoft, Jan
    Jensen, Kent Wickstrom
    Philipsen, Kristian
    Haug, Anders
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 5155 - 5164
  • [32] Bibliometric Survey for Adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Construction Industry- A Safety Perspective
    Hire, Shalaka
    Sandbhor, Sayali
    Ruikar, Kirti
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 29 (01) : 679 - 693
  • [33] Framework for Implementing Industry 4.0 Projects
    Raddi-Mira, Leticya Hilario
    Pecora Junior, Jose Eduardo
    Deschamps, Fernando
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [34] Pandemic Effect on the Industry 4.0 Readiness: A Case Study in Vietnamese Industry
    Lan L.T.N.
    Jeenanunta C.
    Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [35] CHANGE READINESS AS A PROPOSED DIMENSION FOR INDUSTRY 4.0 READINESS MODELS
    Soomro, Mansoor Ahmed
    Hizam-Hanafiah, Mohd
    Abdullah, Nor Liza
    Jusoh, Muhammad Shahar
    LOGFORUM, 2021, 17 (01) : 83 - 96
  • [36] Investigating the Readiness Factors for Industry 4.0 Implementation for Manufacturing Industry in Egypt
    Khourshed, Nevien Farouk
    Elbarky, Sahar Sobhy
    Elgamal, Sarah
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [37] Readiness of Companies in Relation to Industry 4.0 Implementation
    Poor, Peter
    Basl, Josef
    HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, PT II, 2019, 2019, 9 : 236 - 248
  • [38] The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0
    Ghobakhloo, Morteza
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (06) : 910 - 936
  • [39] Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective
    Sung, Tae Kyung
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 132 : 40 - 45
  • [40] Industry 4.0 - Perspective for Germany
    Uhlmann, E.
    WT Werkstattstechnik, 2015, 105 (7-8):