Bias in Surgical Residency Evaluations: A Scoping Review

被引:10
|
作者
Helliwell, Lydia A. [6 ]
Hyland, Colby J. [1 ,2 ]
Gonte, Madeleine R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Malapati, Sri Harshini [1 ]
Bain, Paul A. [5 ]
Ranganathan, Kavitha [1 ]
Pusic, Andrea L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Countway Lib Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
KEY WORDS; implicit bias; explicit bias; surgery; resi-dent evaluation; disparities; IMPLICIT GENDER BIAS; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PLASTIC-SURGERY; COMPETENCE; PERFORMANCE; OBSTETRICS; SKILLS; SCORES; FUNDAMENTALS; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.04.007
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Given widespread disparities in the surgical workforce and the advent of competency-based training models that rely on objective evaluations of resident per-formance, this review aims to describe the landscape of bias in the evaluation methods of residents in surgical training programs in the United States.DESIGN: A scoping review was conducted within PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ERIC in May 2022, without a date restriction. Studies were screened and reviewed in duplicate by 3 reviewers. Data were described descriptively. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: English-language studies con-ducted in the United States that assessed bias in the eval-uation of surgical residents were included.RESULTS: The search yielded 1641 studies, of which 53 met inclusion criteria. Of the included studies, 26 (49.1%) were retrospective cohort studies, 25 (47.2%) were cross-sectional studies, and 2 (3.8%) were prospective cohort studies. The majority included general surgery residents (n = 30, 56.6%) and nonstandardized examination modali-ties (n = 38, 71.7%), such as video-based skills evaluations (n = 5, 13.2%). The most common performance metric evaluated was operative skill (n = 22, 41.5%). Overall, the majority of studies demonstrated bias (n = 38, 73.6%) and most investigated gender bias (n = 46, 86.8%). Most stud-ies reported disadvantages for female trainees regarding standardized examinations (80.0%), self-evaluations (73.7%), and program-level evaluations (71.4%). Four stud-ies (7.6%) assessed racial bias, of which all reported disad-vantages for trainees underrepresented in surgery.CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation methods for surgery resi-dents may be prone to bias, particularly with regard to female trainees. Research is warranted regarding other implicit and explicit biases, such as racial bias, as well as for nongeneral surgery subspecialties. ( J Surg Ed 80:922-947.& COPY; 2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 947
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Evaluations and Interventions on Fall Risk: A Scoping Review
    S. Luiting
    S. Jansen
    L. J. Seppälä
    J. G. Daams
    Nathalie van der Velde
    The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2019, 23 : 330 - 337
  • [42] Increasing diversity in STEM academia: a scoping review of intervention evaluations
    Meyer, Johanna
    Barnett, Julie
    Corbett, Estelle
    Yeomans, Lucy
    Blackwood, Leda
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [43] CAPTURING THE COMPLEXITY OF EVALUATIONS OF HEALTH PROMOTION INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Kania, Ania
    Patel, Alka B.
    Roy, Amrita
    Yelland, Gregory S.
    Nguyen, Duyen Thi Kim
    Verhoef, Marja J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION, 2012, 27 (01) : 65 - 91
  • [44] Evaluations of postoperative transitions in care for older adults: a scoping review
    Hladkowicz, Emily
    Dumitrascu, Flavia
    Auais, Mohammad
    Beck, Andrew
    Davis, Sascha
    McIsaac, Daniel I.
    Miller, Jordan
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [45] The impact of ex-post legislative evaluations: a scoping review
    Knap, Linda J.
    van Gameren, Rob
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    Legemaate, Johan
    Friele, Roland D.
    Nivel
    JOURNAL OF LEGISLATIVE STUDIES, 2025, 31 (01): : 289 - 312
  • [46] Economic evaluations of interventions against viral pandemics: a scoping review
    Rasmussen, M. K.
    Kronborg, C.
    Fasterholdt, I.
    Kidholm, K.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 208 : 72 - 79
  • [47] Algorithm Bias and Perceived Fairness: A Comprehensive Scoping Review
    Amirhossein, Hajigholam Saryazdi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 COMPUTERS AND PEOPLE RESEARCH CONFERENCE, SIGMIS-CPR 2024, 2024,
  • [48] Bias in Observed Assessments in Medical Education: A Scoping Review
    Ismaeel, Romaisa
    Pusic, Luka
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Chan, Teresa M.
    Oyedokun, Taofiq O.
    Thoma, Brent
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2024, 99 (12) : 1438 - 1450
  • [49] Weight bias and health care utilization: a scoping review
    Alberga, Angela S.
    Edache, Iyoma Y.
    Forhan, Mary
    Russell-Mayhew, Shelly
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 20 : e116
  • [50] Economic Evaluations in Surgical Oncology - A Systematic Review
    Brar, S. S.
    Datta, I.
    Quereshy, F. A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 : S119 - S119