Prevalence of allergic sensitization with vernal keratoconjunctivitis: A systematic review with meta-analyses

被引:10
|
作者
Rasmussen, Marie Louise Roed [1 ,2 ]
D'Souza, Maria [1 ]
Topal, Divan Gabriel [1 ]
Gradman, Josefine [3 ]
Larsen, Dorte Ancher [4 ]
Lehrmann, Bettina Behrmann [5 ]
Kjaer, Henrik Fomsgaard [6 ]
Kessel, Line [1 ,2 ]
Subhi, Yousif [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Valdemar Hansens Vej 3, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Hans Christian Andersen Childrens Hosp, Odense, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Vejle Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Vejle, Denmark
[6] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Allergy Ctr, Odense, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
关键词
IgE; meta-analysis; skin prick test; systematic review; vernal keratoconjunctivitis; EOSINOPHIL CATIONIC PROTEIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-E LEVELS; SERUM-LEVELS; CASE SERIES; TEARS; IGE; IMMUNOTHERAPY; CHILDREN; CONJUNCTIVAL; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1111/aos.15212
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To determine the prevalence of allergic sensitization in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and to provide an overview of published studies on this topic. We systematically searched 11 literature databases on 24 May 2021, for studies with cross-sectional data on the prevalence of positive allergy tests in patients with VKC. Our main outcome of interest was the prevalence of allergic sensitization and the allergens involved. Prevalence meta-analyses were made to provide summary estimates. We identified 33 eligible studies for qualitative review with 2122 patients with VKC. Studies were predominantly based on patients seen in ophthalmology clinics. Overall, studies reported that the most prevalent positive allergen tests were the inhaled allergens house dust mites and pollen. Twenty-nine studies were eligible for the quantitative analysis. Here, we calculated the prevalence of allergen-positive patients to 57.7% (95% confidence interval: 52.5%-62.8%). Subgroup analyses of pooled estimates on sensitization based on specific testing methods found prevalence estimates of 51.4% for conjunctival provocation test, 68.7% for total tear IgE, 58.9% for specific tear IgE, and 58.2% for skin prick test. The prevalence of allergic sensitization in patients with VKC is 57.7%, and mostly towards inhaled allergens. The most frequent positive allergens are house dust mites and pollen. Identifying possible clinically relevant allergens provide information that may aid in managing VKC, such as environmental allergy-avoidance or allergy-specific treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 21
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fasting and metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and Meta-analyses
    Li, Xue
    Nian, Binbin
    Li, Ruizhi
    Cao, Xinyu
    Liu, Yanjun
    Liu, Yuanfa
    Xu, Yong-Jiang
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2024, 64 (07) : 1836 - 1844
  • [42] Psychological treatment of depression; a systematic review of meta-analyses
    Cuijpers, P
    Dekker, J
    NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENEESKUNDE, 2005, 149 (34) : 1892 - +
  • [43] Exploring the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology: a systematic review
    Nanji, Keean
    Xie, Jim
    Hatamnejad, Amin
    Pur, Daiana R.
    Phillips, Mark
    Zeraatkar, Dena
    Wong, Tien Yin
    Guymer, Robyn H.
    Kaiser, Peter K.
    Sivaprasad, Sobha
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Steel, David H.
    Wykoff, Charles C.
    Chaudhary, Varun
    EYE, 2024, 38 (16) : 3153 - 3160
  • [44] The Brain in Oral Clefting: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses
    Sandor-Bajusz, Kinga A.
    Sadi, Asaad
    Varga, Eszter
    Csabi, Gyorgyi
    Antonoglou, Georgios N.
    Lohner, Szimonetta
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROANATOMY, 2022, 16
  • [45] Adjunctive Nutraceuticals for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Sarris, Jerome
    Murphy, Jenifer
    Mischoulon, David
    Papakostas, George I.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Berk, Michael
    Ng, Chee H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 173 (06): : 575 - 587
  • [46] Challenges in the peer review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Vintzileos, Anthony M.
    Carvajal, Jonathan
    Islam, Shahidul
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (08): : 768 - 771
  • [47] Systematic Review of Published Meta-Analyses of Vaccine Safety
    Dimova, Rositsa B.
    Egelebo, Christopher C.
    Izurieta, Hector S.
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (03): : 293 - 302
  • [48] Quality of meta-analyses in freshwater ecology: A systematic review
    Lodi, Sara
    Godoy, Bruno S.
    Ortega, Jean C. G.
    Bini, Luis M.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (05) : 803 - 814
  • [49] Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses
    Wilson, Adam B.
    Bay, Boon Huat
    Byram, Jessica N.
    Carroll, Melissa A.
    Finn, Gabrielle M.
    Hammer, Niels
    Hildebrandt, Sabine
    Krebs, Claudia
    Wisco, Jonathan J.
    Organ, Jason M.
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 17 (07) : 1392 - 1395
  • [50] Systematic review and meta-analyses on the effects of napping on cognition
    Leong, R. L. F.
    Lo, J. C.
    Chee, M. W. L.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2022, 31