A review of 3D printing low-carbon concrete with one-part geopolymer: Engineering, environmental and economic feasibility

被引:45
|
作者
Al-Noaimat, Yazeed A. [1 ]
Ghaffar, Seyed Hamidreza [1 ,2 ]
Chougan, Mehdi [1 ]
Al-Kheetan, Mazen J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, England
[2] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Mutah Univ, Coll Engn, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, POB 7, Mutah 61710, Karak, Jordan
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
3D printing; One -part geopolymers; Solid activator; Fresh properties; Hardened properties; Environmental impact; Cost assessment; ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER; FLY-ASH; CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; DIGITAL FABRICATION; HARDENED PROPERTIES; MIXTURE DESIGN; CONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; ALKALI;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01818
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
3D printing is a developing technology that has the ability to use different materials to produce concrete elements with complex shapes. The utilization of geopolymers or alkali-activated ma-terials (AAMs) in 3D printing is receiving significant interest due to the environmental benefits of replacing ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The use of solid activators to produce a one-part geopolymer can help the broader use of geopolymers at large scales, as the corrosive, viscous, and hazardous liquid activators used in two-part geopolymers do not present a feasible large-scale solution for this technology. This paper reviews the 3D printable one-part geopolymers, their compositions, and the effect of different precursor compositions, activator content, and different admixtures on the fresh and hardened properties of the mixtures. The environmental impact and cost assessment of one-part geopolymers produced by conventional and 3D printing methods are also discussed and compared to OPC and two-part geopolymers. This review concluded that one -part geopolymers are easier to mix and use than two-part geopolymers and have a lower carbon footprint than two-part geopolymers and OPC concrete. However, one-part geopolymers may not be as strong as two-part geopolymers, but they are still better than OPC.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of 3D printing of geopolymer composites for structural and functional applications
    Shilar, Fatheali A.
    Ganachari, Sharanabasava, V
    Patil, Veerabhadragouda B.
    Bhojaraja, B. E.
    Khan, T. M. Yunus
    Almakayeel, Naif
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2023, 400
  • [32] Mix suitable for concrete 3D printing: A review
    Khan, M. A.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 32 : 831 - 837
  • [33] Biomimicry for 3D concrete printing: A review and perspective
    du Plessis, Anton
    Babafemi, Adewumi John
    Paul, Suvash Chandra
    Panda, Biranchi
    Tran, Jonathan Phuong
    Broeckhoven, Chris
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 38
  • [34] Biomimicry for 3D concrete printing: A review and perspective
    du Plessis, Anton
    Babafemi, Adewumi John
    Paul, Suvash Chandra
    Panda, Biranchi
    Tran, Jonathan Phuong
    Broeckhoven, Chris
    Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 38
  • [35] Research progress on low carbon characters of 3D concrete printing based construction
    Xia, Kailun
    Chen, Yuning
    Liu, Chao
    Zhang, Yamei
    Jia, Lutao
    Yu, Qian
    Yang, Min
    Jia, Zijian
    Pan, Jinlong
    Chen, Chun
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45 (03): : 15 - 33
  • [36] A review on 3D printing in tissue engineering applications
    Mani, Mohan Prasath
    Sadia, Madeeha
    Jaganathan, Saravana Kumar
    Khudzari, Ahmad Zahran
    Supriyanto, Eko
    Saidin, Syafiqah
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi
    Faudzi, Ahmad Athif Mohd
    JOURNAL OF POLYMER ENGINEERING, 2022, 42 (03) : 243 - 265
  • [37] 3D printing for cardiovascular tissue engineering: a review
    Roy, Abhishek
    Saxena, Varun
    Pandey, Lalit M.
    MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 33 (06) : 433 - 442
  • [38] Differences between 3D printed concrete and 3D printing reinforced concrete technologies: a review
    Momeni, Komeil
    Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich
    Hematibahar, Mohammad
    Gebre, Tesfaldet Hadgembes
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 10
  • [39] 3D Printing for Innovative Engineering Solutions "The Environmental Challenge"
    Al-Hamidi, Yasser
    Kozusznik, Marcin
    Al-Rawashdeh, Mamoun
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 8, 2023,
  • [40] A critical review of engineered geopolymer composite: A low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete
    Elmesalami, Nouran
    Celik, Kemal
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 346