Intraoperative Antibiotic Use in Patients With Early-onset Scoliosis: Current Practices and Trends

被引:0
|
作者
Faust, Millis [1 ]
Allahabadi, Sachin [2 ,3 ]
Louer, Craig [4 ]
Sponseller, Paul [5 ]
Strum, Peter [6 ]
Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba [7 ]
Oetgen, Matthew [8 ]
Swarup, Ishaan [2 ,3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Oakland, San Francisco Benioff Childrens Hosp Oakland, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Childrens Orthopaed, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Orthopaed Surg, Cincinnati, OH USA
[7] FOCOS Orthoped Hosp, Accra, Ghana
[8] Childrens Natl Hosp, Dept Pediat Orthopaed Surg, Washington, DC USA
[9] Pediat Spine Study Grp, Valley Forge, PA USA
[10] UCSF, Benioff Childrens Hosp, 747 52nd St, Oakland, CA 94609 USA
关键词
early-onset scoliosis; antibiotics; Best Practice Guidelines; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PREVENTION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0000000000002392
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients were published in September 2019. Recommendations included using intravenous cefazolin and topical vancomycin for all index procedures, plus gram-negative coverage for neuromuscular patients. Guideline adherence is unknown. This study aimed to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of index growth-friendly procedures and assess changes in practice patterns over time. Materials and Methods:This retrospective review of data collected through a multicenter study group included EOS patients undergoing index growth-friendly procedures between January 2018 and March 2021, excluding revisions, lengthenings, and tetherings. Demographics, clinical measurements, intraoperative antibiotics, and 90-day complications were recorded. Descriptive and univariate statistics were utilized. Antibiotic prophylaxis from April 2018 through September 2019 and October 2019 through March 2021 were compared with evaluate change after BPG publication. Results:A total of 562 patients undergoing growth-friendly procedures were included. The most common scoliosis types included neuromuscular (167, 29.7%), syndromic (134, 23.8%), and congenital (97, 17.3%). Most index procedures involved magnetically controlled growing rods (417, 74%) followed by vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib or traditional growing rods (105, 19%). Most patients received cefazolin alone at index procedure (310, 55.2%) or cefazolin with an aminoglycoside (113, 20.1%). Topical antibiotics were used in 327 patients (58.2%), with most receiving vancomycin powder. There was increased use of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside after BPG publication (16% vs. 25%) (P=0.01). Surgical site infections occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) within 90 days of index procedure, 10 pre-BPGs (3%), and 2 post-BPGs (0.9%), with no significant difference in surgical site infection rate by type of antibiotic administered (P>0.05). Conclusions:Historical variability exists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis during index growth-friendly procedures for EOS. There continues to be variability following BPG publication; however, this study found a significant increase in antibiotic prophylaxis against gram-negative bacteria after BPG publication. Overall, greater emphasis is needed to decrease variability in practice, improve compliance with consensus guidelines, and evaluate BPG efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Paper #19: Utilization and Reliability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Vertebral Column Resections for Severe Early-Onset Scoliosis
    McClung A.
    Mundis G.
    Pawelek J.
    Garg S.
    Yaszay B.
    Boachie-Adjei O.
    Sanders J.O.
    Sponseller P.
    Pérez-Grueso F.J.S.
    Lavelle W.
    Emans J.
    Johnston C.
    Akbarnia B.
    Spine Deformity, 2017, 5 (6) : 448 - 449
  • [32] Developments, Focuses, and Trends in Early-Onset Scoliosis From 2005 to 2020: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis
    Liu, Ziyang
    Gao, Kang
    Hai, Yong
    Liu, Tie
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E697 - E710
  • [33] Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with growing rods in patients with neurofibromatosis-1
    Carbone, Marco
    Vittoria, Francesca
    Del Sal, Alice
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2019, 28 (03): : 278 - 287
  • [34] Effect of growing rod on sagittal and spinopelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis patients
    Sariyilmaz, Kerim
    Akgul, Turgut
    Ozkunt, Okan
    Dikici, Fatih
    Korkmaz, Murat
    Sar, Cuneyt
    Domanic, Unsal
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2016, 25 (03): : 263 - 266
  • [35] EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF EARLY-ONSET SCOLIOSIS A Team Approach
    Anari, Jason B.
    Flynn, John M.
    Campbell, Robert M.
    Cahill, Patrick J.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2020, 8 (10)
  • [36] Variability of Expert Opinion in Treatment of Early-onset Scoliosis
    Vitale, Michael G.
    Gomez, Jaime A.
    Matsumoto, Hiroko
    Roye, David P., Jr.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (05) : 1317 - 1322
  • [37] Growing rod construct for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis
    Hossein Mehdian
    Oliver M. Stokes
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 647 - 651
  • [38] The efficacy of bracing in the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis
    Li, Haixia
    Wu, Jigong
    Song, Lizhi
    Shao, Shuilin
    Chen, Zhiming
    Wang, Jiaxu
    Gao, Bo
    Huo, Litao
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [39] Growing rod construct for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis
    Mehdian, Hossein
    Stokes, Oliver M.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S647 - S651
  • [40] Early-Onset Scoliosis: Updated Treatment Techniques and Results
    Hardesty C.K.
    Huang R.P.
    El-Hawary R.
    Samdani A.
    Hermida P.B.
    Bas T.
    Balioğlu M.B.
    Gurd D.
    Pawelek J.
    McCarthy R.
    Zhu F.
    Luhmann S.
    Spine Deformity, 2018, 6 (4) : 467 - 472