Comparison of Outcomes of Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14,547 Patients

被引:2
|
作者
Rajnish, Rajesh Kumar [1 ]
Srivastava, Amit [2 ,3 ]
Kumar, Prasoon [4 ]
Yadav, Sandeep Kumar [1 ]
Sharma, Siddhartha [4 ]
Ul Haq, Rehan [5 ]
Aggarwal, Aditya Nath [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Jodhpur, India
[2] Univ Coll Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Delhi, India
[3] GTB Hosp, Delhi, India
[4] PGIMER, Dept Orthopaed, Chandigarh, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Bhopal, India
关键词
Intertrochanteric femur fracture; Hip fracture; Pertrochanteric fracture; Intramedullary; Cephalomedullary nail; SHORT INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS; SLIDING HIP SCREW; OTA; 31-A1; PROXIMAL FEMUR; PATIENTS OLDER; ANTI-ROTATION; COMPLICATIONS; FAILURE; A2; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s43465-023-00915-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeIntertrochanteric Femur Fractures (IFF) fixation could be done with short or long Cephalomedullary Nails (CMNs). Nevertheless, despite several studies in the literature, there has been a continued lack of consensus on which design of CMN is better than the other. Hence, the current review aimed to evaluate the evidence about short versus long CMNs for the fixation of IFF.MethodologyPRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol for the study was registered to PROSPERO. Four databases, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched. A total of 31 studies with 6 randomized trials (RCTs) and 25 non-randomized studies were included. Demographic data, follow-up period, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted and evaluated from each of the included studies; statistical analysis was done by Review Manager Software version 5.4.1.ResultsFourteen thousand five hundred forty-seven patients were included in this review.Primary OutcomesLong CMNs showed statistically significant lower rates of ipsilateral shaft femur refracture (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14, 2.24, p = 0.007); however, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups for mortality at 30 days and within 1 year.Secondary OutcomesStatistically significant shorter duration of surgery (MD-17.83 (95% CI - 22.03, - 13.63, p < 0.05), less intra-operative blood loss (MD - 62.65, 95% CI - 97.13 to - 28.17, p = < 0.05), and lower blood transfusion rates (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62, 0.83, p < 0.05) for short CMNs; no statistically significant difference for the length of hospital stay, implant-related complications, overall complications, re-operation rates, fluoroscopy time, and functional outcome between two groups of CMNs was seen.ConclusionWith shorter operative time, lesser intra-operative blood loss, and lower postoperative transfusion rates for short CMNs, they have certain benefits over longer CMNs. However, more distal shaft femur fractures were seen in the shorter version of nail, which should be considered before offering these nails to a patient; careful and individualized postoperative weight-bearing protocol could minimize the same.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1187
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Elderly Patients With Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cheng, Tao
    Zhang, Guoyou
    Zhang, Xianlong
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2011, 18 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [22] Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jie
    Li, Haomin
    Jia, Haobo
    Ma, Xinlong
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2020, 54 (06) : 639 - 646
  • [23] Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review
    Pernille Bovbjerg
    Lonnie Froberg
    Hagen Schmal
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 1823 - 1831
  • [24] Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review
    Bovbjerg, Pernille
    Froberg, Lonnie
    Schmal, Hagen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (08): : 1823 - 1831
  • [25] Comparison of clinical outcomes with hip replacement versus PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA)
    Chen, Junming
    Yue, Chen
    He, Peilin
    Huang, Zeling
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Xue
    Fan, Yanan
    Liu, Youwen
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (09) : E24166
  • [26] Arthroplasty vs proximal femoral nails for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Wen-Huan
    Guo, Wen-Xuan
    Gao, Shi-Hua
    Wei, Qiu-Shi
    Li, Zi-Qi
    He, Wei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (32) : 9878 - 9888
  • [27] Arthroplasty vs proximal femoral nails for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen-Huan Chen
    Wen-Xuan Guo
    Shi-Hua Gao
    Qiu-Shi Wei
    Zi-Qi Li
    Wei He
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, 9 (32) : 9878 - 9888
  • [28] Comparison of the outcomes of syndesmotic ankle fractures treated with dynamic fixation versus static fixation versus fibular nail: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Cho, Thomas
    Waters, Amy
    Senthilkumar, Shiva
    Shendge, Shradha
    Liu, Jiayong
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2024, 9
  • [29] Fracture fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hongku, Natthapong
    Woratanarat, Patarawan
    Nitiwarangkul, Lertkong
    Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2022, 108 (01)
  • [30] Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bundschuh, Kyle E.
    Grommersch, Bryan M.
    Tipton, Shane C.
    Chihab, Samir
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Guild, George N., III
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07): : S450 - S458