SAGES perspective: professional medical associations, commercial interests, and conflicts of interest

被引:1
|
作者
Shadduck, Phillip [1 ,2 ]
Sylla, Patricia [3 ]
Schwarz, Erin [4 ]
Reinke, Caroline [5 ]
Denk, Peter [6 ]
Ginsberg, Shelley [7 ]
Asbun, Horacio [8 ]
Pryor, Aurora [9 ]
机构
[1] Duke Reg Hosp, Durham, NC 27704 USA
[2] NC Specialty Hosp, Durham, NC 27704 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] BSC Management & Vivacity Consulting, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Atrium Hlth, Carolinas Med Ctr, Charlotte, NC USA
[6] Lee Hlth, Ft Myers, FL USA
[7] BSC Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Miami Canc Inst, Miami, FL USA
[9] Donald & Barbara Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Long Isl Jewish Med Ctr, New Hyde Pk, NY USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
Professional medical association; Conflict of interest; Bias; Disclosure; Ethics; Open payments; PERCEIVED BIAS; COMPREHENSIVE PROCESS; INDUSTRY SUPPORT; PERCEPTIONS; PHYSICIANS; DISCLOSURE; SOCIETY; CME;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-09897-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundProfessional medical associations (PMAs) have an essential role in advancing medical care and health. PMAs promote skills training, clinical standards, and other important educational activities. Most often, PMAs are not-for-profit entities that rely upon funding from industry to help cover the costs of these valuable activities. Equally important, innovation and progress in surgery require physician collaboration with industry throughout the product development process. SAGES has opined that, with appropriate Conflict of Interest (COI) disclosure and management processes, PMA educational activities can be both scientifically and ethically sound.MethodsSAGES has developed and implemented comprehensive and stringent processes for managing potential COI within the organization, at the annual meeting, and in developing educational offerings. This document reviews the SAGES COI processes and results 2009-2021.ResultsImplementation of the SAGES COI disclosure and management processes reduced the reported perceived incidence of bias at the annual meeting from 4.4-6.2% (2008-2010) to 1.2-2.2% (2011-2013). Recent comparison of reported disclosures revealed a rise in number of speakers with financial relationships and an increase in reporting of disclosures in presentations without an associated increase in need for conflict resolution by the COI committee. Despite good overall adherence to COI policies, SAGES was recently cited for non-compliance with ACCME standards related to inclusion of faculty with ownership interest. This experience highlighted the potential for discordance in the interpretation of whether disclosures relate to specific CME content. SAGES COI processes have since been updated to reflect the more stringent 2020 ACCME Standards that exclude speakers and planners with ownership interest from any CME activity.ConclusionsThe SAGES experience with disclosure and mitigation of financial relationships highlights the challenges of validating the accuracy of physician disclosures and establishing the relevance of financial relationships to the content of accredited educational activities. SAGES will continue to streamline its COI disclosure process with specific focus on aligning all financial disclosures among the various reporting platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:2517 / 2527
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conflicts of interest in the medical profession
    Altisent, Rogelio
    Delgado-Marroquin, Maria-Teresa
    Astier-Pena, Maria-Pilar
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2019, 51 (08): : 506 - 511
  • [22] Professional Associations and Conflict of Interest
    Wingate, Sue
    HEART & LUNG, 2009, 38 (04): : 283 - 283
  • [23] Conflicts of Interest in Medical Education Recommendations From the Pew Task Force on Medical Conflicts of Interest
    Korn, David
    Carlat, Daniel
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (22): : 2397 - 2398
  • [24] Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) statement on the relationship between professional medical associations and industry
    Buyske, Jo
    Easter, David
    Forde, Kenneth
    Holzman, Michael
    Melvin, W. Scott
    Schirmer, Bruce
    Schwaitzberg, Steven
    Scott, Daniel
    Smith, C. Daniel
    Talamini, Mark
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (04): : 742 - 744
  • [27] On the fragility of medical virtue in a neoliberal context: the case of commercial conflicts of interest in reproductive medicine
    Christopher Mayes
    Brette Blakely
    Ian Kerridge
    Paul Komesaroff
    Ian Olver
    Wendy Lipworth
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2016, 37 : 97 - 111
  • [28] On the fragility of medical virtue in a neoliberal context: the case of commercial conflicts of interest in reproductive medicine
    Mayes, Christopher
    Blakely, Brette
    Kerridge, Ian
    Komesaroff, Paul
    Olver, Ian
    Lipworth, Wendy
    THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2016, 37 (01) : 97 - 111
  • [29] Commentary on "Reporting Potential Conflicts of Interest among Authors of Professional Medical Societies' Guidelines"
    Downey, LaVonne A.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 105 (08) : 416 - 417
  • [30] Conflict of interest and professional medical associations: the North American Spine Society experience
    Schofferman, Jerome A.
    Eskay-Auerbach, Marjorie L.
    Sawyer, Laura S.
    Herring, Stanley A.
    Arnold, Paul M.
    Muehlbauer, Eric J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (08): : 974 - 979