Tips and tricks for how to become a good reviewer

被引:4
|
作者
Hughes, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Cristiani, Riccardo [2 ,3 ]
Hirschmann, Michael T. [4 ,5 ]
Musahl, Volker [1 ,8 ]
Eriksson, Karl [6 ,7 ]
Karlsson, Jon [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 3200 S Water St, Pittsburgh, PA 15101 USA
[2] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm Sports Trauma Res Ctr, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] FIFA Med Ctr Excellence, Capio Artro Clin, Valhallavagen 91, S-11486 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Kantonsspital Baselland, Dept Orthoped Surg & Traumatol, CH-4101 Bruderholz, Switzerland
[5] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Res, Res Grp Michael T Hirschmann, Regenerat Med & Biomech, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland
[6] Stockholm South Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
PEER REVIEWERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-023-07595-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Peer review is an essential process to ensure that scientific articles meet high standards of methodology, ethics and quality. The peer-review process is a part of the academic mission for physicians in the university setting. The work of reviewers is of great value for authors, as it gives constructive criticism and improves manuscript quality before publication. Often, however, reviews are of suboptimal quality. Usually, reviewers do not receive formal training either on how to perform a review or on the peer-review process. In addition, it is generally believed that experienced authors are great reviewers, but this may not always be true. The overarching goal of a review is to make the manuscript better; to help the authors. The purpose of this article is to offer relevant suggestions and provide a checklist on how to perform a useful review.
引用
收藏
页码:4631 / 4636
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GIS Tips & Tricks Having Options is a Good Thing
    Karlin, Al
    Waldorf, Todd
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 86 (06): : 350 - 350
  • [22] Peer review: how to be a good reviewer
    Caon, Martin
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2008, 31 (04) : XIII - XIV
  • [23] How to be a Good Reviewer for a Scientific Journal
    Siau, Keith
    Kulkarni, Anand V.
    El-Omar, Emad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 12 (04) : 1238 - 1243
  • [24] Peer review: how to be a good reviewer
    Martin Caon
    Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2008, 31 : xiii - xiv
  • [25] Tips and Tricks Create Good Scientific Presentations and give Confident Lectures - Publication "Good Scientific Presentations: Content, Checklist, Tips and Tricks" published
    Roehrig, Bernd
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2024, 86 (11) : 690 - 690
  • [26] Tips and Tricks How to be the Best - Clinical Oncologist
    Sleijfer, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S41 - S41
  • [27] How to Write a Research Protocol: Tips and Tricks
    Cameli, Matteo
    Novo, Giuseppina
    Tusa, Maurizio
    Mandoli, Giulia Elena
    Corrado, Giovanni
    Benedetto, Frank
    Antonini-Canterin, Francesco
    Citro, Rodolfo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ECHOGRAPHY, 2018, 28 (03) : 151 - 153
  • [28] How to choose and become a reviewer for a scientific medical journal
    Guerre, Paola
    Vescovo, Giorgio
    Granata, Paola
    Politi, Cecilia
    Fontanella, Andrea
    Manfellotto, Dario
    Nardi, Roberto
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (02) : 151 - 158
  • [29] How to Become a Mentor and Be Good at It
    West, Robin
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (02) : 233 - 239
  • [30] How to Become a Good Student
    王娜
    韩天福
    中学生英语, 2017, (43) : 6 - 6