The Alaska permanent fund dividend increases residential payments for water services

被引:0
|
作者
Johnson, Barbara [1 ]
Molina, Allen [2 ]
Herrmann, Mark [4 ]
Aggarwal, Srijan [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[2] Oregon Dept Transportat, Salem, OR 97301 USA
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Civil Geol & Environm Engn Dept, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[4] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Coll Business & Secur Management, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[5] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Northern Engn, Water & Environm Res Ctr, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ADVANCES | 2024年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
CONSUMPTION; INCOME;
D O I
10.1039/d3va00219e
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alaska has the lowest rate of access to in-home water services in the United States. At the same time, the state also has the world's oldest Universal Basic Income (UBI) program, and every Alaska resident receives an annual payment through the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) program. In this study, we use a panel dataset of rural Alaska water and sewer utilities in 18 Alaska villages from 2012 to 2016 to explore the impact of the PFD on residential payments. We estimate fixed effects for eight models. Models are developed by grouping villages by low and high variability in payments, enrollment in Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) regional corporations and Community Development Quota (CDQ) organizations. We find that on average, each utility is missing $14 710 in customer payments yearly, and have a median residential delinquency rate of 14%. The model with all the villages (p < 0.01), ANCSA models (p < 0.05), and CDQ models (p < 0.05) all show a significant increase in residential payments when the PFD is paid in October. Average residential payments in October are $3671 to $10 058 higher than in other months. The increased payments represent 2% to 6% of the total revenue of utilities. We estimate that across rural Alaska the PFD generates between $734 200 to $2 011 600 in additional payments for water utilities. These findings suggest that the PFD and other unrestricted cash transfers can play an important role in increasing household water security in rural Alaska and other places with similar problems.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 197
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: A novel institutional approach
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Adamowski, Jan
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 144 - 154
  • [42] Aggregation of Residential Water Heaters for Peak Shifting and Frequency Response Services
    Clarke, Thomas
    Slay, Tylor
    Eustis, Conrad
    Bass, Robert B.
    IEEE OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2020, 7 (01): : 22 - 30
  • [43] Incidence of Subsidies in Residential Public Services in Mexico: The Case of the Water Sector
    Borja-Vega, Christian
    Morales, Emmanuel E. Garcia
    Gonzalez, Julio A.
    WATER, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [44] Approaches to cost-effectiveness of payments for tree planting and forest management for water quality services
    Valatin, G.
    Ovando, P.
    Abildtrup, J.
    Accastello, C.
    Andreucci, M. B.
    Chikalanov, A.
    El Mokaddem, A.
    Garcia, S.
    Gonzalez-Sanchis, M.
    Gordillo, F.
    Kayacan, B.
    Little, D.
    Lyubenova, M.
    Nisbet, T.
    Paletto, A.
    Petucco, C.
    Termansen, M.
    Vasylyshyn, K.
    Vedel, S. E.
    Yousefpour, R.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 53
  • [45] The Chinese characteristics of payments for ecosystem services: a conceptual analysis of water eco-compensation mechanisms
    Wang, Raymond Yu
    Ng, Cho Nam
    Qi, Xiaoxing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 36 (04) : 651 - 669
  • [46] Measuring the incremental impact of Payments for Watershed Services on water quality in a transboundary river basin in China
    Zeng, Qingmin
    Brouwer, Roy
    Wang, Yurong
    Chen, Ligen
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 51
  • [47] Towards operational payments for water ecosystem services in Tanzania: a case study from the Uluguru Mountains
    Lopa, Dosteus
    Mwanyoka, Iddi
    Jambiya, George
    Massoud, Thabit
    Harrison, Paul
    Ellis-Jones, Mark
    Blomley, Tom
    Leimona, Beria
    van Noordwijk, Meine
    Burgess, Neil D.
    ORYX, 2012, 46 (01) : 34 - 44
  • [48] How Do Stakeholders Working on the Forest-Water Nexus Perceive Payments for Ecosystem Services?
    Balikova, Klara
    Cervena, Tereza
    De Meo, Isabella
    De Vreese, Rik
    Deniz, Tugba
    El Mokaddem, Abdelmohssin
    Kayacan, Bekir
    Larabi, Fadila
    Libiete, Zane
    Lyubenova, Mariyana
    Malovrh, Spela Pezdevsek
    Potocki, Kristina
    Pelyukh, Oksana
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Sarvasova, Zuzana
    Salka, Jaroslav
    Stevanov, Mirjana
    Stojnic, Srdjan
    Jarsky, Vilem
    Vuletic, Dijana
    Zahvoyska, Lyudmyla
    Paletto, Alessandro
    FORESTS, 2020, 11 (01):
  • [49] The effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services at delivering improvements in water quality: lessons for experiments at the landscape scale
    Pynegar, Edwin L.
    Jones, Julia P. G.
    Gibbons, James M.
    Asquith, Nigel M.
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [50] The Financing of Wastewater Treatment and the Balance of Payments for Water Services: Evidence from Municipalities in the Region of Valencia
    Garcia-Lopez, Marcos
    Melgarejo, Joaquin
    Montano, Borja
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)