Application of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Determine the Appropriate Policy for Maintenance of Buildings in Karaj City, Iran

被引:0
|
作者
Kheradranjbar, Mohammad [1 ]
Mohammadi, Mirali [2 ]
Rafiee, Shahin [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Karaj Branch, Karaj 31499, Iran
[2] Urmia Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, POB 165, Orumiyeh 57561, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Univ Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Karaj 31587, Iran
关键词
Building assessment; Repair and maintenance; Multicriteria decision-making; Delphi method; Borda method; FUZZY-AHP; SELECTION; STRATEGY; SWARA; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1131
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Maintenance operations embrace all parts of the building, such as structural and architectural parts, mechanical and electrical installations, and how they are serviced, including the most detailed to the most sensitive components in the building. This research uses the Delphi method and prepares a questionnaire with the construction industry experts' opinions to determine the main criteria. The purpose of this article is to identify and prioritize the effective indicators for the building maintenance system and determine the most appropriate strategy for this system using multicriteria decision making methods. The proposed method first calculates the weight of the indicators and then prioritizes the indicators based on fuzzy and nonfuzzy multicriteria decision-making methods. Finally, the final rankings of the indices were calculated using the mean rank and final ranking methods. According to the review of all methods, it was found that safety, health and accessibility indices are the first to third priorities, respectively. Finally, by examining the results obtained from a case study (Karaj City, Iran) and examining the experts' opinions, it was found that the obtained results are different and the corrective maintenance (CM) and breakdown maintenance (BM) strategies are the most appropriate.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of multicriteria decision-making techniques to manoeuvre planning in nonholonomic robots
    Martin Ramos, J. M.
    Lopez Garcia, D.
    Gomez-Bravo, F.
    Blanco Moron, A.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (05) : 3962 - 3976
  • [33] FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING IN DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORIES - AN APPLICATION OF APPROXIMATE REASONING
    FENG, C
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1995, 71 (02) : 197 - 205
  • [34] Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy aggregation operators with application in multicriteria decision-making
    Akram, Muhammad
    Dudek, Wieslaw A.
    Dar, Jawaria Mohsan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (11) : 3000 - 3019
  • [35] Exploring decision-making methods for sustainable design in commercial buildings
    Wang, Aifeng
    Xing, Lin
    Mohammed, Khidhair Jasim
    Salameh, Anas A.
    Jan, Amin
    Ali, H. Elhosiny
    EzzEl-Arab, Islam
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2022, 43 (02): : 279 - 292
  • [36] Multicriteria decision-making methods and their application to local development analysis: Application of a case in the municipalities of the Autonomous Community of Castilla and Leon
    Colino, Alberto
    INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES-JOURNAL OF REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, (20) : 221 - 222
  • [37] BUILDINGS, CITY AND TERRITORY BETWEEN REAL COMPLEXITY AND DECISION-MAKING REDUCTIVISM
    Karrer, Francesco
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 23 : 21 - 25
  • [38] Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Technique for a Low-Class Road Maintenance Program
    Khademi, Navid
    Sheikholeslami, Abdolreza
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2010, 16 (03) : 188 - 198
  • [39] Comparison of the multicriteria decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The US evidence
    Patari, Eero
    Karell, Ville
    Luukka, Pasi
    Yeomans, Julian S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 265 (02) : 655 - 672
  • [40] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
    Kraujaliene, Lidija
    BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION, 2019, 17 (01) : 72 - 93