Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study

被引:1
|
作者
Geramipanah, Farideh [1 ]
Sadighpour, Leyla [1 ]
Payaminia, Leila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dent Implant Res Ctr, Dept Prosthodont, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
accuracy; arch size; digital impression; implant; MARGINAL FIT; SYSTEM; RESTORATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.793
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression in two intraoral scanners of Trios (3shape) and CEREC (Omnicam).Material and Methods: Four acrylic models each including six implants at sites 11, 12, 15, 17, 23, and 27 were used, including large with parallel implants, large with angled implants, small with parallel implants, and small with angled implants. After tightening the scan bodies, distance measurements were done using a coordinate measuring machine. Then, each model was scanned 10 times using each scanner. Trueness and precision measurements were finally computed.Results: The trueness values ranged from 20 to 260 mu m in CEREC Omnicam, and from 40 to 1030 mu m in Trios. The precision values ranged from 30 to 190 mu m in CEREC Omnicam, while from 50 to 770 mu m in Trios. The multivariate test analysis indicated that the measured distances via two scanners and different models show different behaviors. Pairwise interactions between these three variables were significant (p < .05). Pairwise interactions between these variables were also significant. (p < .0001).Conclusions: Arch width could affect the accuracy of digital impression; by rotating toward the second quadrant and end points of the scan, errors have increased. However, the angulation of the implants had no effect on the accuracy of digital impression. The CEREC Omnicam scanner showed higher accuracy (trueness and precision) compared to the Trios (3shape) one.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 992
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy evaluation of two different intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A comparative in vitro study
    Verniani, G.
    Casucci, A.
    Nosrati, N.
    D'Arienzo, L. F.
    Val, M.
    Cagidiaco, E. Ferrari
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2024, 16 (01) : 61 - 64
  • [22] Full arch accuracy of intraoral scanners with different acquisition technologies: An in vitro study
    Baresel, Ingo
    Baresel, Jens
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 156
  • [23] Influence of the ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using two intraoral scanners
    Ochoa-Lopez, Gaston
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (02): : 552 - 559
  • [24] Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: An in vitro study
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Arcuri, Lorenzo
    Lio, Fabrizio
    Papa, Andrea
    Nardi, Alessandra
    Londono, Jimmy
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119
  • [25] Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review
    Zhang, Yi-Jie
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Qian, Shu-Jiao
    Qiao, Shi-Chong
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (02) : 157 - 179
  • [26] Accuracy of 3 Intraoral Scanners in Recording Impressions for Full Arch Dental Implant-Supported Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study
    Jain, Saurabh
    Sayed, Mohammed E.
    Khawaji, Reem Abdullah A.
    Hakami, Ghada Ali J.
    Solan, Eman Hassan M.
    Daish, Manal A.
    Jokhadar, Hossam F.
    Alresayes, Saad Saleh
    Altoman, Majed S.
    Alshehri, Abdullah Hasan
    Alqahtani, Saeed M.
    Alamri, Mohammad
    Alshahrani, Ahid Amer
    Al-najjar, Hind Ziyad
    Mattoo, Khurshid
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [27] In vitro Evaluation of Accuracy of Single Dies Captured by Two Intraoral Digital Scanners
    Burde, Alexandru Victor
    Gasparik, Cristina
    Moldovan, Marioara
    Baciu, Sorana
    Cosma, Cosmin
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2018, 55 (02) : 176 - 178
  • [28] Effects of Implant Angulation, Material Selection, and Impression Technique on Impression Accuracy: A Preliminary Laboratory Study
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Sveikata, Kestutis
    Savickas, Raimondas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2012, 25 (05) : 512 - 515
  • [29] Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: An in vivo prospective comparative study
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Carosi, Paolo
    Gallucci, German O.
    Nagy, Katalin
    Nardi, Alessandra
    Arcuri, Lorenzo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (10) : 1106 - 1117
  • [30] Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study
    Ma, Bowen
    Yue, Xinxin
    Sun, Yujie
    Peng, Lingyan
    Geng, Wei
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)