共 50 条
Evaluating the Relationship between Neighborhood-Level Social Vulnerability and Patient Adherence to Ophthalmology Appointments
被引:8
|作者:
Scanzera, Angelica C.
[1
,5
]
Kravets, Sasha
[1
,2
]
Hallak, Joelle A.
[1
]
Musick, Hugh
[3
]
Krishnan, Jerry A.
[3
]
Chan, R. V. Paul
[1
]
Kim, Sage J.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Illinois, Illinois Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Inst Healthcare Delivery Design, Populat Hlth Sci Program, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Adm, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Illinois Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, 1855 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Access;
adherence;
health equity;
social vulnerability index;
social vulnerability;
SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS;
HEALTH DISPARITIES;
VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;
CARE;
DISCRIMINATION;
DETERMINANTS;
STRATEGIES;
MORTALITY;
BLINDNESS;
INDEX;
D O I:
10.1080/09286586.2023.2180806
中图分类号:
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号:
100212 ;
摘要:
PurposeTo examine the association between neighborhood-level social vulnerability and adherence to scheduled ophthalmology appointments.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, records of all patients >= 18 years scheduled for an ophthalmology appointment between September 12, 2020, and February 8, 2021, were reviewed. Primary exposure is neighborhood-level Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) based on the patient's residential location. SVI is a rank score of 15 social factors into four themes (socioeconomic status, household composition/disability, minority status/language, and housing type/transportation), ranging from 0 to 1.0, with higher ranks indicating greater social vulnerability. The overall SVI score and each theme were analyzed separately as the primary exposure of interest in multivariable logistic regression models that controlled for age, sex, appointment status (new or established), race, and distance from clinic. The primary outcome, non-adherence, was defined as missing more than 25% of scheduled appointments.ResultsOf 8,322 patients (41% non-Hispanic Black, 24% Hispanic, 22% non-Hispanic White) with scheduled appointments, 28% were non-adherent. Non-adherence was associated with greater social vulnerability (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 0.01 increase in overall SVI = 2.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.99, 3.06]) and each SVI theme (socioeconomic status: aOR = 2.38 [1.94, 2.91]; household composition/disability: aOR = = 1.51 [1.26, 1.81]; minority status/language: aOR = 2.03 [1.55, 2.68]; housing type/transportation: aOR = 1.41 [1.16, 1.73]).ConclusionNeighborhood-level social vulnerability is associated with greater risk of non-adherence to scheduled ophthalmology appointments, controlling for individual characteristics. Multi-level intervention strategies that incorporate neighborhood-level vulnerabilities are needed to reduce disparities in access to ophthalmology care.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文