Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of moral hazard and adverse selection of public private partnership projects

被引:19
|
作者
Owusu-Manu, De-Graft [1 ]
Kukah, Augustine Senanu Komla [2 ]
Edwards, David John [3 ,4 ]
Ameyaw, Ernest Effah [5 ]
机构
[1] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Construct Technol & Management, Kumasi, Ghana
[2] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Distance Learning, Kumasi, Ghana
[3] Fac Comp Engn & Built Environm, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Northumbria Univ, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Moral hazard; adverse selection; public-private-partnership; construction projects; fuzzy synthetic evaluation model; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION; PPP PROJECTS; WATER; MODEL; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1080/15623599.2021.2010356
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Moral hazards and adverse selection (MHAS) lead to failure in public-private partnership (PPP) projects and delay in delivery outputs' requirements. This research developed a fuzzy synthetic evaluation model (FSEM) to measure cause and effect level of MHAS of PPP construction projects. Mean score ranking and principal component factor analysis (PCFA) evaluated the causal factors. FSEM calculated overall cause and effect (OCE) level. PCFA analysis yielded three components: party and risk factors, incentives and contractual obligations and contract and project conditions while FSEM determined the OCE level to be 3.92. Party and risk factors; incentives and contractual obligations; contract and project conditions had cause and effect levels of 3.99, 3.99 and 3.79. Findings will enhance knowledge on MHAS risk levels of PPP construction projects thereby prompting project stakeholders to reduce the risks. Further research recommends using computer-based systems to minimize complexities and human errors during manual computation of fuzzy analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1805 / 1814
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An evaluation of the impact of risk cost on risk allocation in public private partnership projects
    Almarri, Khalid
    Alzahrani, Saleh
    Boussabaine, Halim
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (08) : 1696 - 1711
  • [42] Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS
    Liu, Jicheng
    Wei, Qiushuang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 211 - 222
  • [43] Private-sector partner selection for public-private partnership projects of electric vehicle charging infrastructure
    Zhang, Lihui
    Zhao, Zhenli
    Kan, Zhinan
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (05) : 1469 - 1484
  • [44] Risk Factors in IT Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Ghribi, Souhir
    Hudon, Pierre-Andre
    Mazouz, Bachir
    PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2019, 24 (04) : 321 - 343
  • [45] Risk Ranking of Malaysian Public Private Partnership Projects
    Sarvari, Hadi
    Valipuor, Alireza
    Yahaya, Nordin
    Noor, Norhazilan Md
    STRUCTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, COASTAL AND OFFSHORE ENGINEERING, 2014, 567 : 613 - 618
  • [46] The execution of public-private partnership projects in the UAE
    Dulaimi, Mohammed Fadhil
    Alhashemi, Mohamed
    Ling, Florence Yean Yng
    Kumaraswamy, Mohan
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (04) : 393 - 402
  • [47] A NEW CHALLENGE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS
    Mandruleanu, Anca
    Coretchi, Doru
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, VOL 1, 2011, : 290 - 292
  • [48] Liability of Foreignness in Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Kong, Zijiong
    Ma, Hanyang
    Lv, Kangjuan
    Shi, Jonathan J. J.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 149 (09)
  • [49] Discounting for public-private partnership projects in China
    Luo, Lanlan
    Zou, Ziran
    Chen, Shou
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 98 : 218 - 226
  • [50] Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Jin Xiaohua
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 326 - 330