Conservation agriculture practices in a peanut cropping system: Effects on pod yield and soil penetration resistance

被引:1
|
作者
Betiol, Olavo [1 ]
Bolonhezi, Denizart [2 ]
Leal, Elcio Rios Perez [1 ]
Gruener, Chandler Edwin [3 ]
Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti [4 ]
Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli [5 ]
Ruiz, Fabio Fiori [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Engn Rural, Programa Posgrad Ciencia Solo, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[2] Inst Agron Campinas, Ctr Avancado Pesquisa Cana, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA USA
[4] Apta Polo Ctr Norte, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Engn Rural, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Estadual Paulista, Programa Posgrad Prod Vegetal, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
来源
关键词
Arachis hypogaea L; no-tillage; strip-tillage; soil compaction; groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV); REDUCED TILLAGE; COVER CROP; SUGARCANE; RESIDUE; VARIABILITY; ROTATION; CARBON; COTTON;
D O I
10.36783/18069657rbcs20230004
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Conservation agriculture principles applied to peanut can reduce soil erosion and production costs when cultivated in rotation with sugarcane. Still, the problem with soil compaction is the leading cause of skepticism about the efficacy of this practice. This research aimed to study the effect of three soil management strategies compared with conventional for peanut cv. IAC-OL3, cultivated in rotation with sugarcane using the MEIOSI (method of intercropping occurring simultaneously) system for agronomic practices with additional analysis on changes in soil physics properties. The trial was conducted in 2019-2020 in Planalto municipality (Sao Paulo, Brazil) under a green-harvested sugarcane field, using a randomized complete block experimental design. The trial consisted of four soil management treatments (conventional tillage, minimum tillage with chisel, strip-tillage, and no-tillage) with five replications. Although no differences were verified in soil bulk density and porosity among treatments, the highest values of soil penetration resistance were observed in no-tillage treatment for all evaluations (before planting, at the beginning of flowering, and before and after harvesting) in comparison with conventional tillage. The difference in soil penetration resistance among the treatments diminished from planting to the end of the cycle. Furthermore, low soil disturbance and maximum covering with straw significantly increased the available water capacity and reduced the incidence and severity of groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV) on peanut plants. Consequently, both minimum-tillage and no-tillage have increased the pod yield on average by 695 and 991 kg ha-1 more than strip-tillage and conventional tillage, respectively, without differences in terms of quality and pod losses.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Matemba-Mutasa, Rumbidzai
    Rusinamhodzi, Leonard
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2015, 146 : 230 - 242
  • [22] Productivity and profitability of sorghum-wheat cropping system in saline soils as influenced by conservation agriculture practices
    Soni, Pooja Gupta
    Rai, Arvind Kumar
    Basak, Nirmalendu
    Kumar, Parveen
    Sundha, Parul
    RANGE MANAGEMENT AND AGROFORESTRY, 2021, 42 (02) : 277 - 285
  • [23] Conservation Agriculture Practices: Impact on Productivity, Energy Utilisation and Profitability of Legume-based Cropping System
    Sobhana, E.
    Swaminathan, C.
    Kannan, P.
    Gurusamy, A.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [24] EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE LAND MANAGEMENT AND CROPPING PRACTICES FOR SOIL CONSERVATION
    EDWARDS, K
    ROSEWELL, CJ
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 6 (03) : 120 - 124
  • [25] Conservation agriculture in intensive rice cropping reverses soil potassium depletion
    M. J. Islam
    M. Cheng
    U. Kumar
    M. Maniruzzaman
    S. S. Nasreen
    M. E. Haque
    M. Jahiruddin
    R. W. Bell
    M. M. R. Jahangir
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2023, 125 : 437 - 451
  • [26] Conservation agriculture in intensive rice cropping reverses soil potassium depletion
    Islam, M. J.
    Cheng, M.
    Kumar, U.
    Maniruzzaman, M.
    Nasreen, S. S.
    Haque, M. E.
    Jahiruddin, M.
    Bell, R. W.
    Jahangir, M. M. R.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2023, 125 (03) : 437 - 451
  • [27] Effects of conservation agriculture technologies on soil macrofauna community attributes in rainfed agriculture system
    Parvizi, Yahya
    Heshmati, Mosayeb
    Gheituri, Mohammad
    Toohidi, Mohammadtaghi
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2024, 116 (05) : 2229 - 2241
  • [28] Soil fertility and pomelo yield influenced by soil conservation practices
    Dung, Tran Van
    Dang, Le Van
    Ngoc, Ngo Phuong
    Hung, Ngo Ngoc
    OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 8 (01):
  • [29] SOIL QUALITY EFFECT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN MAIZE-RAPESEED CROPPING SYSTEM IN EASTERN HIMALAYA
    Das, Anup
    Ghosh, Probir Kumar
    Lal, Rattan
    Saha, Ritesh
    Ngachan, Shishomvanao
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (06) : 1862 - 1874
  • [30] Soil and cropping system research in semi-arid West Africa as related to the potential for conservation agriculture
    Mason, Stephen C.
    Ouattara, Korodjouma
    Taonda, Sibiri Jean-Baptiste
    Pale, Siebou
    Sohoro, Adama
    Kabore, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 13 (02) : 120 - 134