Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Closure Parameters of Transition Models

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Ziming [1 ]
Liu, Zaijie [1 ]
Yan, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Natl Key Lab Computat Fluid Dynam, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LAMINAR-TURBULENT TRANSITION; LOCAL VARIABLES; FLOW; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001496
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The closure parameters introduced in transition models can compromise the accuracy of prediction results. This paper investigated the uncertainty caused by the closure parameters in transition models (gamma and k-omega-gamma), and identified the key parameters that have the greatest impact on quantities of interest. The uncertainty was propagated by the point-collocation no-intrusive polynomial chaos method, and the relative contribution of each parameter to uncertainty was assessed by the Sobol index. The natural transition flow (Schubauer-Klebanoff flat plate) and low-velocity airfoil flow (NLF0416 airfoil) were chosen for computational cases. The results, which are highly dependent on the closure parameters, validate the necessity of uncertainty research. The parameters of the k-omega-gamma model are more sensitive than those of the gamma model. In the gamma model, the most critical parameter is C(TU2, )which is negatively related to the transition position, i.e., the transition delays when C-TU2 increases and advances when C-TU2 decreases. In the k-omega-gamma model, the most critical parameter is C-2, which is positively related to the transition position. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EXTENDED FORWARD SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Zhao, Haihua
    Mousseau, Vincent A.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 181 (01) : 184 - 195
  • [22] Uncertainty Quantification Analysis and Application Research on Cross-Flow Transition Model Parameters
    Xiang X.-H.
    Zhang Y.-F.
    Chen J.-Q.
    Yuan X.-X.
    Chen S.-S.
    Yuhang Xuebao/Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41 (09): : 1141 - 1150
  • [23] Sensitivity analysis, uncertainty quantification, and optimization for thermochemical properties in chemical kinetic combustion models
    vom Lehn, Florian
    Cai, Liming
    Pitsch, Heinz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2019, 37 (01) : 771 - 779
  • [24] A GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN, UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER SIMULATION MODELS
    Wu, Sichao
    Mortveit, Henning S.
    2015 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2015, : 1139 - 1150
  • [25] Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Effective Models for Microwave Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors
    Tokoutsi, Zoi
    Baragona, Marco
    ADVANCES IN DIGITAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL BIOENGINEERING, VOL 1, EHB-2023, 2024, 109 : 145 - 154
  • [26] Uncertainty Quantification of Complement Sensitivity Indices in Dynamic Computer Models
    Drignei, Dorin
    Mourelatos, Zissimos
    Zhen Hu
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 5 (02):
  • [27] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of turbulence model closure coefficients for sheet cavity flow around a hydrofoil
    Romani, Simone
    Morgut, Mitja
    Parussini, Lucia
    Piller, Marzio
    BRODOGRADNJA, 2025, 76 (01):
  • [28] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR RIM SEAL INGESTION WITH 1-D NETWORK MODELS
    Dominguez, Alejandro Pozo
    Hills, Nicholas
    Marques, Simao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2020: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, VOL 2D, 2020,
  • [29] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of seismic metabarriers
    Zeighami, Farhad
    Sandoval, Leonardo
    Guadagnini, Alberto
    Di Federico, Vittorio
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 277
  • [30] A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications
    Eck, Vinzenz Gregor
    Donders, Wouter Paulus
    Sturdy, Jacob
    Feinberg, Jonathan
    Delhaas, Tammo
    Hellevik, Leif Rune
    Huberts, Wouter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 (08)