Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Closure Parameters of Transition Models

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Ziming [1 ]
Liu, Zaijie [1 ]
Yan, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Natl Key Lab Computat Fluid Dynam, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LAMINAR-TURBULENT TRANSITION; LOCAL VARIABLES; FLOW; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001496
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The closure parameters introduced in transition models can compromise the accuracy of prediction results. This paper investigated the uncertainty caused by the closure parameters in transition models (gamma and k-omega-gamma), and identified the key parameters that have the greatest impact on quantities of interest. The uncertainty was propagated by the point-collocation no-intrusive polynomial chaos method, and the relative contribution of each parameter to uncertainty was assessed by the Sobol index. The natural transition flow (Schubauer-Klebanoff flat plate) and low-velocity airfoil flow (NLF0416 airfoil) were chosen for computational cases. The results, which are highly dependent on the closure parameters, validate the necessity of uncertainty research. The parameters of the k-omega-gamma model are more sensitive than those of the gamma model. In the gamma model, the most critical parameter is C(TU2, )which is negatively related to the transition position, i.e., the transition delays when C-TU2 increases and advances when C-TU2 decreases. In the k-omega-gamma model, the most critical parameter is C-2, which is positively related to the transition position. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of flow parameters for transition models on hypersonic flows
    Zhao, Yatian
    Yan, Chao
    Liu, Hongkang
    Zhang, Kailing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2019, 135 : 1286 - 1299
  • [2] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL PARAMETERS IN CRYSTAL PLASTICITY FINITE ELEMENT MODELS
    Khadyko, Mikhail
    Sturdy, Jacob
    Dumoulin, Stephane
    Hellevik, Leif Rune
    Hopperstad, Odd Sture
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS OF MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 13 (03) : 379 - 400
  • [3] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters
    Xu, Chonggang
    Gertner, George Zdzislaw
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (10) : 1563 - 1573
  • [4] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models
    Harenberg, Daniel
    Marelli, Stefano
    Sudret, Bruno
    Winschel, Viktor
    QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2019, 10 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [5] Global sensitivity analysis for uncertainty quantification in fire spread models
    Ujjwal, K. C.
    Aryal, Jagannath
    Garg, Saurabh
    Hilton, James
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2021, 143
  • [6] ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN MECHANICS COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    Liang, Bin
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2011, 1 (02) : 147 - 161
  • [7] Transition of the variational sensitivity analysis to polymorphic uncertainty quantification to soil investigations
    Henning, C.
    Ricken, T.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS, MECHANICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, : 297 - 302
  • [8] Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Subsurface Defect Detection with Sparse Models
    Zygiridis, Theodoros
    Kyrgiazoglou, Athanasios
    Amanatiadis, Stamatios
    Kantartzis, Nikolaos
    Theodoulidis, Theodoros
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2024, 43 (04)
  • [9] Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of neuron models with ion concentration dynamics
    Signorelli, Letizia
    Manzoni, Andrea
    Saetra, Marte J.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [10] Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models
    Pathmanathan, Pras
    Cordeiro, Jonathan M.
    Gray, Richard A.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 10