Economic integration and consumption risk sharing: A comparison of Eurozone and OECD countries

被引:3
|
作者
Beck, Krzysztof [1 ]
Yersh, Valeryia [1 ]
机构
[1] Lazarski Univ, 43 Swieradowska St, PL-02662 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Economic integration; Eurozone; OECD; Business cycle synchronization; Risk sharing; Dynamic common correlated effects mean; group estimator; BUSINESS-CYCLE SYNCHRONIZATION; REAL EXCHANGE-RATE; HOME BIAS; UNITED-STATES; INDUSTRIAL SPECIALIZATION; FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION; MODEL SELECTION; PORTFOLIO FLOWS; WELFARE GAINS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.026
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Economic theory predicts that economic integration can facilitate improvements in international consumption risk sharing. We test this proposition by comparing risk sharing among Eurozone members and members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) using a dynamic common correlated effects mean group estimator (DCCEMG). The results reveal that the OECD members outperform the Eurozone members in terms of short run and long run risk sharing, despite the barriers to risk sharing being considerably lower among the latter. We attribute this outcome to lower business cycle synchronization and stock return correlations among OECD members, which creates better opportunities to share risk within the group. The results highlight the trade-off between the benefits of business cycle synchronization and international risk sharing. More tightly integrated economies, facilitate trade in assets that promotes better portfolio diversification, while at the same time are characterized by higher business cycle synchronization that depletes agents of risk sharing opportunities. Consequently, our results give strong support to the hypothesis of "diminishing international diversification potential". However, the benefits associated with the improved risk sharing are increasing with the number of countries in the monetary union.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 803
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries
    Apergis, Nicholas
    Payne, James E.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (01) : 656 - 660
  • [22] Market Integration between Turkey and Eurozone Countries
    Apergis, Nicholas
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    Sen, Fatma Ogucu
    Wang, Shixuan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (09) : 2674 - 2686
  • [23] Natural gas consumption and economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD countries
    Destek, Mehmet Akif
    ENERGY, 2016, 114 : 1007 - 1015
  • [24] Study of mediated consumption effect of Renewable Energy on Economic Growth of OECD countries
    Naseri, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
    Motamedi, Sima
    Ahmadian, Majid
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2016, 36 : 502 - 509
  • [25] Biomass energy consumption and economic growth nexus in OECD countries: A panel analysis
    Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen
    Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 162 : 1649 - 1654
  • [26] The effects of economic and political integration on fiscal decentralization: evidence from OECD countries
    Stegarescu, Dan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (02): : 694 - 718
  • [27] Financial integration and consumption risk sharing in East Asia
    Kim, S
    Kim, SH
    Wang, Y
    JAPAN AND THE WORLD ECONOMY, 2006, 18 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [28] Coal Consumption and Economic Growth: Panel Cointegration and Causality Evidence from OECD and Non-OECD Countries
    Jin, Taeyoung
    Kim, Jinsoo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
  • [29] CAPITAL FORMATION, CONSUMPTION AND TRADE EFFECTS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH - AN ARDL BASED INVESTIGATION FOR THE EUROZONE COUNTRIES
    Firtescu, Bogdan Narcis
    Marcu, Nicu
    Oprea, Florin
    Filip, Bogdan-Florin
    Nicula, Vasile-Cosmin
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2020, 19 (2B): : 849 - 874
  • [30] COMPARISON OF OECD COUNTRIES WITH CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS ACCORDING TO THE ECONOMIC FREEDOM INDEX
    Bayram, Seliha Secil
    Ersoz, Filiz
    RTU 59TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (SCEE 2018), 2018, : 13 - 22