The potency of natural resources and trade globalisation in the ecological sustainability target for the BRICS economies

被引:22
|
作者
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday [1 ]
Samour, Ahmed [2 ]
Alola, Andrew Adewale [3 ,4 ]
Abbas, Shujaat [5 ]
Aga, Mehmet [6 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Int Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Turkiye
[2] Dhofar Univ, Dept Accounting, Salalah, Oman
[3] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, CREDS Ctr Res Digitalizat & Sustainabil, Hamar, Norway
[4] Nisantasi Univ, Fac Econ Adm & Social Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[6] Cyprus Int Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Accounting & Finance, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Turkiye
关键词
Ecological footprint; Natural resources; Renewable energy; Trade globalisation; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; NONRENEWABLE ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; GROWTH; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15734
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The BRICS nations have yet to significantly contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 7 and 13. Dealing with this problem might necessitate a policy shift, which is the main topic of this research. Therefore, the current study scrutinizes the interrelationship between natural resources, energy, trade globalisation and ecological footprint using panel data from the period between 1990 and 2018 for the BRICS nations. To assess the interrelationship between ecological footprint and its determinants, we used the Cross sectional autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) and common correlated effects. mean group (CCEMG) estimators. The findings show that economic progress, and natural resources lessen ecological quality, while renewable energy and trade globalization improves ecological quality in the BRICS nations. Based on these results, the BRICS nations need to upgrade their use of renewable energy sources and improve the structure of their natural resource endowments. Furthermore, trade globalisation necessitates immediate policy responses in these nations since it reduces ecological damage.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trade balance, monetary supply, commodity prices, and greener energy growth: contextual evidence from BRICS economies in the lens of sustainability
    Sukhmani Kaur
    Shalini Aggarwal
    Suleman Sarwar
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 73928 - 73940
  • [32] Natural resources, green innovation, fintech, and sustainability: A fresh insight from BRICS (vol 80, 103119, 2023)
    Liu, Lisha
    Mousa, Saeed
    Arnone, Gioia
    Muda, Iskandar
    Huerta-Soto, Rosario
    Zhai, Shiming
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 82
  • [33] Analysis of over-consumption of natural resources and the ecological trade deficit in China based on ecological footprints
    Gao, Jixi
    Tian, Meirong
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 899 - 904
  • [34] Uncovering the impact of Fintech, Natural Resources, Green Finance and Green Growth on Environment sustainability in BRICS: An MMQR analysis
    Wei, Haoqiang
    Yue, Guiling
    Khan, Noor Ullah
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 89
  • [35] How do natural resources, digitalization, and institutional governance contribute to ecological sustainability through load capacity factors in highly resource-consuming economies?
    Ni, Zehua
    Yang, Jingyi
    Razzaq, Asif
    Resources Policy, 2022, 79
  • [36] How do natural resources, digitalization, and institutional governance contribute to ecological sustainability through load capacity factors in highly resource-consuming economies?
    Ni, Zehua
    Yang, Jingyi
    Razzaq, Asif
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 79
  • [37] Natural resources, trade and fintech in the era of digitalization: A study of economies involved in Belt and Road Initiative
    Xiaobin W.
    Wu F.
    Alharthi M.
    Raza S.M.F.
    Albalawi O.
    Resources Policy, 2024, 93
  • [38] Natural resources a curse or blessings for international trade? Empirical evidence from high indebted economies
    Yu, Xiuzhi
    Jia, Fengshuo
    Khan, Suliman
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Nassani, Abdelmohsen A.
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 89
  • [39] Ecological footprints, global sustainability, and the roles of natural resources, financial development, and economic growth
    Marshadi, Ali Hussein A. L.
    Aslam, Muhammad
    Janjua, Azhar Ali
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (03):
  • [40] Economic Gain vs. Ecological Pain-Environmental Sustainability in Economies Based on Renewable Biological Resources
    Pedersen, Simen
    Gangas, Kristin E.
    Chetri, Madhu
    Andreassen, Harry P.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)