Early-Stage Ampullary Cancer: Is Local Excision an Effective Alternative to Radical Resection?

被引:1
|
作者
Swanson, James [1 ]
Littau, Michael [1 ]
Tonelli, Celsa [2 ]
Cohn, Tyler [2 ]
Luchette, Fred A. [3 ,5 ]
Abdelsattar, Zaid [4 ,5 ]
Baker, Marshall S. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Maywood, IL USA
[2] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[3] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[4] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[5] Edward Hines Jr Vet Adm Med Ctr, Hines, IL USA
[6] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 2160 S First St, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000000666
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of local excision (transduodenal or endoscopic ampullectomy) in treating early-stage ampullary cancer has not been well defined. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing either local tumor excision or radical resection for early-stage (cTis-T2, N0, M0) ampullary adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2018. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. Patients undergoing local excision were then 1:1 propensity score-matched for demographics, hospital level, and histopathological factors to those undergoing radical resection. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) profiles for matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1,544 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 218 (14%) underwent local tumor excision, and 1,326 (86%) radical resection. On propensity score matching, 218 patients undergoing local excision were successfully matched to 218 patients undergoing radical resection. On comparison of matched cohorts, those undergoing local excision had lower rate of margin-negative (R0) resection (85.1% vs 99%, p < 0.001) and lower median lymph node count (0 vs 13, p < 0.001) but had significantly shorter length of initial hospitalization (median days: 1 vs 10 days, p < 0.001), lower rate of 30-day readmission (3.3% vs 12.0%, p = 0.001), and lower rate of 30-day mortality (1.8% vs 6.5%, p = 0.016) than patients undergoing radical resection. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the matched cohorts (46.9% vs 52.0%, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with early-stage ampullary adenocarcinoma, local tumor excision is associated with higher rate of R1 resection but accelerated postprocedure recovery and patterns of OS comparable with those after radical resection. ( J Am Coll Surg 2023;237:146-156. (c) 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 156
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IS LOCAL EXCISION A BETTER OPTION THAN RADICAL RESECTION FOR STAGE I RECTAL CANCER IN OCTOGENARIANS?
    Duraes, L.
    Remzi, F.
    Gorgun, E.
    Liska, D.
    Stocchi, L.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E233 - E234
  • [22] Local excision of early rectal cancer: is transanal endoscopic microsurgery an alternative to radical surgery?
    Palma, P.
    Horisberger, K.
    Joos, A.
    Rothenhoefer, S.
    Willeke, F.
    Post, S.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2009, 101 (03) : 172 - 178
  • [23] ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF EARLY-STAGE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
    INOUE, H
    ENDO, M
    TAKESHITA, K
    KAWANO, T
    GOSEKI, N
    TAKIGUCHI, T
    YOSHINO, K
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1991, 5 (02): : 59 - 62
  • [24] Is local resection adequate for T1 stage ampullary cancer?
    Amini, Albert
    Miura, John T.
    Jayakrishnan, Thejus T.
    Johnston, Fabian M.
    Tsai, Susan
    Christians, Kathleen K.
    Gamblin, T. Clark
    Turaga, Kiran K.
    HPB, 2015, 17 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [25] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR EARLY-STAGE CANCER OF THE PROSTATE
    WILLIAMS, RD
    UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (02) : 135 - 137
  • [26] Focal early-stage cancer in ampullary adenoma: Surgery or endoscopic papillectomy?
    Yoon, Soon Man
    Kim, Myung-Hwan
    Kim, Mi Jung
    Jang, Se Jin
    Lee, Tae Yoon
    Kwon, Seunghyun
    Oh, Hyoung-Chul
    Lee, Sang Soo
    Seo, Dong-Wan
    Lee, Sung Koo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB365 - AB365
  • [27] Radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: A compromise?
    Hahnloser, D
    Larson, DW
    Wolff, BG
    Sato, J
    Nivatvongs, S
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (04) : 576 - 576
  • [28] Local excision as a viable alternative to hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in women of reproductive age: a population-based cohort study
    Chen, Ying
    Zheng, Yongqiang
    Wu, Yaling
    Dai, Jun
    Zhu, Xiaoran
    Wu, Tong
    Tang, Weicheng
    Yang, Shuhao
    Zhang, Jinjin
    Zhou, Su
    Wu, Meng
    Zhang, Chun
    Wang, Shixuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (06) : 1688 - 1698
  • [29] Early rectal cancer: Local excision or radical surgery?
    Chang, Alexandre Jin Bok Audi
    Nahas, Caio Sergio Rizkollah
    Araujo, Sergio E. Alonso
    Nahos, Sergio C.
    Marques, Carlos F. Sporapon
    Kiss, Desiderio Roberto
    Cecconello, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 65 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [30] LOCAL RESECTION OF AMPULLARY NEOPLASM AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO WHIPPLE PROCEDURES
    NIOTIS, MT
    MANSOUR, GMI
    MEYERS, WC
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 94 (05) : A324 - A324